寻衅滋事罪定罪量刑问题研究

发布时间：2019-03-21 08:29

【摘要】：寻衅滋事罪在我国刑法理论研究和司法实践中是争议较大的一个罪名。在流氓罪没有被废止之前,寻衅滋事是其犯罪行为方式之一,1997年《刑法》的修订中,废止了流氓罪并设立了寻衅滋事罪,2011年《刑法修正案(八)》又对其进行了修正,随后几年最高人民法院和最高人民检察院又出台了关于其相关的司法解释和量刑指导意见,但是在寻衅滋事罪定罪量刑的司法实践中还是存在一些问题。在寻衅滋事罪定罪的司法实践工作中,因其犯罪行为方式与其他相关犯罪存在交叉重合情况,比如与故意伤害罪、抢劫罪、故意毁坏财物罪和聚众扰乱社会秩序罪等罪的界限划分模糊不定,容易混淆。通过研究解析寻衅滋事罪的犯罪构成要件,明确了其犯罪主观方面存在的“流氓动机”要素和犯罪的复杂客体等观点主张后,可以明确划分寻衅滋事罪与其他相关犯罪混淆的问题,对于某种行为是否为寻衅滋事罪的认定,也可以进行客观正确的判断。关于2013年《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理利用信息网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》增加了利用信息网络实施寻衅滋事罪的规定,也有必要明确理解利用信息网络寻衅滋事罪的行为类型及认定问题,以便寻衅滋事罪在网络空间的应用。对于网络空间是否可以理解为公共场所的争议,网络空间应该理解为公共场所,这样才能发挥寻衅滋事罪在虚拟网络世界中打击造谣、传播虚假信息等犯罪行为的功能作用,进而维护网络空间以及社会秩序的稳定。司法实践工作中判定一个行为构成寻衅滋事罪后,那对其的量刑工作也需要认真对待。根据法律法规、司法解释和量刑指导意见等的规定,结合寻衅滋事罪本身的特点,对寻衅滋事罪案件判定正确的法定刑幅度,明确两款刑罚幅度的裁量标准,最终实现罪责刑的相适应。在对寻衅滋事罪案件量刑时,在坚持规范化的量刑方法前提下,结合寻衅滋事罪案件的犯罪事实情况,确定其量刑起点、基准刑、宣告刑。因为寻衅滋事罪本身属于较轻的犯罪,所以在对其量刑时,在其符合缓刑和免除处罚的条件时,应积极适用两种刑罚方式,这样既可以发挥两种刑罚方式的功能,也能实现刑罚的教育改造目的,最终实现预防寻衅滋事罪的犯罪行为人再犯罪的目的。
[Abstract]:The crime of provoking and causing trouble is one of the most controversial crimes in the theoretical research and judicial practice of criminal law in our country. Until the crime of hooliganism was not abolished, the crime of hooliganism was one of its forms of criminal conduct, and in the 1997 revision of the Criminal Code, the crime of hooliganism was abolished and the crime of provoking hooliganism was established, and it was amended in the 2011 Amendment to the Criminal Code (VIII), In the following years, the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate issued the relevant judicial interpretation and sentencing guidance, but there are still some problems in the judicial practice of the conviction and sentencing of the crime of provoking trouble. In the judicial practice of criminalizing provocative and troublesome crimes, there are overlaps between their criminal conduct and other related crimes, such as intentional injury and robbery. The distinction between the crime of wilful destruction of property and the crime of disturbing social order is ambiguous and easy to be confused. Through the research and analysis of the crime elements of the crime of aggression and nuisance, the author makes clear that the elements of "hooliganism motive" and the complex object of the crime exist in the subjective aspect of the crime, and so on. We can clearly distinguish the confusion between the crime of provoking and causing trouble and other related crimes, and we can also make an objective and correct judgment as to whether a certain act is a crime of provoking and causing trouble. With regard to the 2013 interpretation by the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate on certain issues relating to the application of information networks in criminal cases, such as defamation, the provisions on the use of information networks for the crime of provoking and causing trouble have been added, It is also necessary to understand clearly the types of behavior and identification of the crime of aggression and nuisance by using information network in order to make use of the crime of aggression and nuisance in cyberspace. As to whether cyberspace can be understood as a dispute in a public place, cyberspace should be understood as a public place, so that it can play a functional role in combating mischief and spreading false information in the virtual cyber world. And then maintain the stability of cyberspace and social order. In judicial practice, the sentencing of an act should be taken seriously after it is judged to constitute a crime of provoking and causing trouble. In accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations, judicial interpretation and sentencing guidance, and in the light of the characteristics of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, the correct statutory range of punishment is determined in the case of the crime of provoking aggression and causing trouble, and the discretion standard of the range of the two penalties is defined. Finally realize the adaptation of the criminal responsibility and punishment. In the sentencing of the crime of aggression and nuisance, under the premise of adhering to the standardized sentencing method and combining with the criminal facts of the crime of aggression and nuisance, the starting point of sentencing, the standard punishment, and the declaration of sentence are determined. Because the crime of aggression and nuisance itself is a lesser crime, it is necessary to actively apply the two forms of punishment when sentencing them, when they meet the conditions of probation and exemption from punishment, so that they can play the role of both forms of punishment. It can also achieve the purpose of education and reform of punishment, and finally realize the purpose of preventing the crime of provoking and causing trouble from reoffending.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】