保险诈骗罪研究

发布时间：2019-03-24 12:43

【摘要】：我国《刑法》第一百九十八条具体规定了保险诈骗罪的主体、量刑、行为方式等,这是目前我国惩治保险诈骗罪的最主要法律依据。但是由于经济、社会的飞速发展,保险诈骗的犯罪手段、犯罪对象等表现形式也发生了重大的变化,这就导致了保险诈骗犯罪在司法认定中出现了一些疑难问题,例如,对于保险诈骗罪帮助者行为的司法认定问题,以及保险公司工作人员与投保人、被保险人、受益人相互勾结行为的认定问题,在当前司法实践中存在很大争议;另外,对于故意“带病投保”行为的认定也是说法不一。本文结合实际案例,对上述司法实践中关于保险诈骗行为疑难问题进行分析论证,探索相关立法的完善。
[Abstract]:Article 198 of the Criminal Law of our country specifies the subject, sentencing and behavior of the crime of insurance fraud, which is the main legal basis for punishing the crime of insurance fraud. However, due to the rapid development of economy and society, the crime means of insurance fraud, the object of crime and other forms of expression have also undergone significant changes, which has led to some difficult problems in the judicial determination of insurance fraud crime, for example, In the current judicial practice, there is a great controversy over the judicial determination of the behavior of the helper in the crime of insurance fraud, as well as the identification of the collusion between the staff of the insurance company and the insured, the insured and the beneficiary. In addition, the intentional "insurance with disease" behavior is also said to be inconsistent. Combining with practical cases, this paper analyzes and demonstrates the difficult problems of insurance fraud in judicial practice, and explores the perfection of relevant legislation.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2018
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】