“以网管网”背景下网络平台的刑法境遇
发布时间：2019-03-24 19:14
【摘要】：在"互联网+"时代,网络平台服务提供者扮演着提供交换资源、承担组织调度的角色,已成为身处网络活动第一线的管理者。在法定义务以及与网民协定契约的共同塑造之下,网络平台服务提供者拥有了网络监管中的"软权力",进而引申出"以网管网"的命题。为了确保网络平台服务提供者积极履行"以网管网"职责,《刑法修正案(九)》引入拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪,该罪采取了概括式罪名模式,条文辐射的范围过宽,难以为司法机关对其进行刑事追责提供确定性约束。鉴于此,裁判者应秉持"兼顾互联网行业发展与网络犯罪治理"的基本立场,严格拿捏"不履行法定义务的规范依据与实质内容、责令改正意见的明确性以及义务违反与危害后果间的因果关系"等限制要点,确定该罪名在司法适用中的法治边界,并尝试通过科学的释法来获取该罪名在司法实践中正当的适用范式。
[Abstract]:In the "Internet" era, network platform service providers play the role of providing exchange resources and assuming the role of organization scheduling, and have become the front-line managers of network activities. Under the legal obligation and the contract with netizens, the network platform service provider has the "soft power" in the network supervision, and then extends the proposition of "network pipe network". In order to ensure that the network platform service providers actively perform the duty of "network", the Criminal Law Amendment (9) introduces the crime of refusing to perform the obligation of information network security management. The crime adopts a general pattern of charges, and the scope of the provisions radiation is too wide. It is difficult for the judicial organs to provide certain constraints on criminal accountability. In view of this, judges should adhere to the basic position of "taking into account the development of the Internet industry and the governance of cybercrime", and strictly grasp the normative basis and substance of "failure to perform legal obligations." Ordering the clarity of the correction opinion and the causal link between the breach of obligations and the consequences of harm "and determining the boundaries of the rule of law in the application of justice for the offence, And try to get the proper application paradigm of the crime in judicial practice through the scientific interpretation of the law.
【作者单位】： 大连理工大学法律系;
【基金】：作者主持的辽宁省社科规划基金青年项目“网络黑社会犯罪刑法治理”(L15 CFX007)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.3
，
本文编号：2446602
[Abstract]:In the "Internet" era, network platform service providers play the role of providing exchange resources and assuming the role of organization scheduling, and have become the front-line managers of network activities. Under the legal obligation and the contract with netizens, the network platform service provider has the "soft power" in the network supervision, and then extends the proposition of "network pipe network". In order to ensure that the network platform service providers actively perform the duty of "network", the Criminal Law Amendment (9) introduces the crime of refusing to perform the obligation of information network security management. The crime adopts a general pattern of charges, and the scope of the provisions radiation is too wide. It is difficult for the judicial organs to provide certain constraints on criminal accountability. In view of this, judges should adhere to the basic position of "taking into account the development of the Internet industry and the governance of cybercrime", and strictly grasp the normative basis and substance of "failure to perform legal obligations." Ordering the clarity of the correction opinion and the causal link between the breach of obligations and the consequences of harm "and determining the boundaries of the rule of law in the application of justice for the offence, And try to get the proper application paradigm of the crime in judicial practice through the scientific interpretation of the law.
【作者单位】： 大连理工大学法律系;
【基金】：作者主持的辽宁省社科规划基金青年项目“网络黑社会犯罪刑法治理”(L15 CFX007)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.3
，
本文编号：2446602
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2446602.html
