财产犯罪的占有认定研究
[Abstract]:The cognizance of possession is of great significance in the crime of property. Different from civil law, the concept of possession in criminal law pays attention to the protection of people's peaceful control of things, and through the way of evaluating the behavior of the actor, therefore, the control of the facts of things is still an indispensable factor in possession. Among them, the physical space-time conditions play a fundamental role, while the independent value of possession is mainly reflected in the negation of possession. At the same time, when possession is no longer a mere representation of the "handheld" state, it means that normative factors are incorporated into the concept of possession in addition to factual factors. However, it should be noted that the two are not coupled, but rather the class relationship, that is, social norms play a positive role in fact control. In the past, most of the studies on possession were carried out on different possession problems, and the individuality was more than enough but the commonness was insufficient. In order to achieve the consistency of possession system, it is necessary to discuss the general rules of possession identification. On the other hand, it is found that the concept of "space" can be used as the benchmark for the classification of possession types, so the general rule of possession determination of space dominance theory is formed. In the view of space control theory, the victim surveillance and close taboo has its special significance of legal education, and it can solve the problem of determining the accomplishment of related property crimes. This theory is consistent with the evolution of possession, not only supported by the concept of spatial taboo, but also proved from the perspective of law and economics. Under the general rule of possession determination in the theory of space domination, all kinds of possession problems can be fully and reasonably answered. In the possession of hierarchical relations, space managers occupy and manage objects in space based on the management of space, and in principle they are occupied by the carrier unless the owner of the goods is accompanied by the goods being transported. In the possession of the level relationship, several people constitute an abstract space manager, so no individual can manage the space alone, so several people occupy the property together. In the possession of the reticent, the nature of the silent matter determines that the other people (including the trustee) have no right to destroy the space formed by the packaging. In this sense, the sealed object is occupied by the principal, while the package is occupied by the trustee. In the possession of the deceased, there is no interest in the possession of the deceased, so it fundamentally negates the establishment of the possession of the deceased. In the possession of deposit, the deposit cash is occupied by the bank, and the deposit creditor's right is established on the basis of its special quasi-real right attribute, and the rule of quasi-possession, which is applicable to the possession, is occupied by the depositor. As for the possession of virtual property, the so-called physical space-time condition refers to the objective reality rather than the requirement that it must be tangible, so even in the virtual space, the virtual property can still be occupied.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐凌波;;论财产犯的主观目的[J];中外法学;2016年03期
2 梁云宝;;财产罪占有之立场:缓和的事实性占有概念[J];中国法学;2016年03期
3 孙道萃;;网络财产性利益的刑法保护:司法动向与理论协同[J];政治与法律;2016年06期
4 袁国何;;错误汇款的占有归属及其定性[J];政法论坛;2016年02期
5 徐彰;;盗窃网络虚拟财产不构成盗窃罪的刑民思考[J];法学论坛;2016年02期
6 刘明祥;;窃取网络虚拟财产行为定性探究[J];法学;2016年01期
7 孙运梁;;选言式而非连言式:财产犯中占有概念的界定路径[J];政治与法律;2016年01期
8 陈烨;;无体物的概念溯源及其刑法意蕴[J];时代法学;2015年05期
9 苏云;张理恒;;快递公司分拣员窃取邮包行为定性盗窃罪之刑法教义学可行性路径分析——以杨某窃取邮包二审无罪案展开[J];中国刑事法杂志;2015年05期
10 马寅翔;;占有概念的规范本质及其展开[J];中外法学;2015年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 王雅琼;信用卡诈骗罪研究[D];华东政法大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 蒋宏嘉;私取封缄物内财物行为之定性研究[D];华东政法大学;2014年
2 黎崇;非法占有死者财物行为的刑法分析[D];辽宁大学;2013年
3 冯琦;论财产罪中占有的若干问题[D];华东政法大学;2013年
4 顾俊;占有死者财物行为的刑事定性研究[D];西南政法大学;2013年
5 王东明;论存款的占有[D];吉林大学;2013年
6 孙涛;论刑法中的占有[D];吉林大学;2012年
7 周继凤;论盗窃罪与侵占罪的界限[D];南京师范大学;2012年
8 张欣欣;论非法占有封缄物之刑事认定[D];华东政法大学;2011年
9 刘春兴;刑法中的占有[D];山东大学;2011年
10 李志强;论刑法上的财产占有概念[D];清华大学;2003年
,本文编号:2453377
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2453377.html