吴某二人P2P网贷集资诈骗案评析
发布时间：2019-04-24 16:54
【摘要】：吴甲、吴乙利用P2P网贷集资诈骗案的定性存在较大的争议,主要体现在两被告人构成非法吸收公众存款罪、诈骗罪还是集资诈骗罪。通过对案件争议点的法律分析可知：非法吸收公众存款罪与集资诈骗罪认定的关键在于非法占有目的；诈骗罪和集资诈骗罪认定的关键在于集资行为。从两罪之间的关键构成要件来论证两被告人不构成非法吸收公众存款罪和诈骗罪；从犯罪构成四要件来论证两被告人构成集资诈骗罪。具体论证如下：第一,两被告人具有非法占有目的不构成非法吸收公众存款罪。首先明确非法占有目的之认定方法：非法占有目的认定的推定标准为司法解释,具体认定非法占有目的时应容许反证,并且结合其内涵来验证推定和反证。其次再根据上述方法来认定两被告人具有非法占有目的。第二,两被告人实施了非法集资行为不构成诈骗罪。首先,两被告人设立P2P网贷平台融资即实施了集资行为,其后两被告人利用异化的P2P网贷融资的行为符合利诱性和非法性要素系非法集资行为。第三,两被告人构成集资诈骗罪。两被告人符合集资诈骗罪的犯罪构成四要件：主体为自然人；主观方面系直接故意,且具有非法占有目的；客体上既破坏了国家金融管理秩序又侵犯了公私财产权；客观方面表现为诈骗行为和非法集资行为。
[Abstract]:Wu A and Wu B use the P2P online loan to raise the quality of the fraud case, which is mainly reflected in the crime of illegal absorption of public deposit, fraud and the crime of fund-raising for the two defendants. Through the legal analysis of the dispute point of the case, it is clear that the key to the identification of the crime of illegal absorption of the public deposit and the crime of raising the fund-raising fraud is the purpose of illegal possession; the key to the determination of the crime of fraud and the crime of fund-raising fraud is to raise the fund-raising behavior. It is proved that the two defendants do not constitute the crime of illegal absorption of public deposits and the crime of swindling. The specific argument is as follows: First, the illegal possession of the two defendants does not constitute the crime of illegal absorption of public deposits. First, it is clear that the method of the determination of the purpose of illegal possession: the presumption of the purpose of illegal possession is the judicial interpretation, the purpose of the illegal possession should be allowed to be reversed, and the presumption and contraindication should be verified in combination with its connotation. Secondly, according to the above-mentioned method, it is found that the two accused have the purpose of illegal possession. Secondly, the illegal fund-raising of the two defendants does not constitute a crime of fraud. First, the two accused set up the P2P network loan platform to finance the fund-raising behavior, and then the two defendants use the dissimilatory P2P network loan to finance the behavior, which is in accordance with the illegal fund-raising behavior of the inducing and illegal elements. Third, the two accused constitute a crime of fund-raising and fraud. The two defendants are in accordance with the four elements of the crime of capital-raising fraud: the subject is a natural person; the subjective aspect is the direct intention and has the purpose of illegal possession; the object not only destroys the state financial management order but also violates the public-private property right; The objective aspect is the act of fraud and the illegal fund-raising.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5
[Abstract]:Wu A and Wu B use the P2P online loan to raise the quality of the fraud case, which is mainly reflected in the crime of illegal absorption of public deposit, fraud and the crime of fund-raising for the two defendants. Through the legal analysis of the dispute point of the case, it is clear that the key to the identification of the crime of illegal absorption of the public deposit and the crime of raising the fund-raising fraud is the purpose of illegal possession; the key to the determination of the crime of fraud and the crime of fund-raising fraud is to raise the fund-raising behavior. It is proved that the two defendants do not constitute the crime of illegal absorption of public deposits and the crime of swindling. The specific argument is as follows: First, the illegal possession of the two defendants does not constitute the crime of illegal absorption of public deposits. First, it is clear that the method of the determination of the purpose of illegal possession: the presumption of the purpose of illegal possession is the judicial interpretation, the purpose of the illegal possession should be allowed to be reversed, and the presumption and contraindication should be verified in combination with its connotation. Secondly, according to the above-mentioned method, it is found that the two accused have the purpose of illegal possession. Secondly, the illegal fund-raising of the two defendants does not constitute a crime of fraud. First, the two accused set up the P2P network loan platform to finance the fund-raising behavior, and then the two defendants use the dissimilatory P2P network loan to finance the behavior, which is in accordance with the illegal fund-raising behavior of the inducing and illegal elements. Third, the two accused constitute a crime of fund-raising and fraud. The two defendants are in accordance with the four elements of the crime of capital-raising fraud: the subject is a natural person; the subjective aspect is the direct intention and has the purpose of illegal possession; the object not only destroys the state financial management order but also violates the public-private property right; The objective aspect is the act of fraud and the illegal fund-raising.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 栾晓丽,刘新艳;论集资诈骗罪中“非法占有目的”的若干问题[J];和田师范专科学校学报;2005年02期
2 邵芳;;论集资诈骗罪的认定[J];经济论坛;2008年04期
3 刘慧卓;王一民;;非法吸收公众存款罪与集资诈骗罪的区别[J];人民司法;2010年12期
4 张建;俞小海;;集资诈骗罪对象研究中的认识误区及其辨正[J];中国刑事法杂志;2011年06期
5 张建;俞小海;;集资诈骗罪对象研究中的认识误区及其辨正[J];中国刑事法杂志;2011年09期
6 沈燕;;集资诈骗罪与诈骗罪的区别——如何理解集资诈骗行为的公开性、社会性特征[J];商品与质量;2012年S4期
7 陕报;;集资诈骗罪有哪些特征[J];农村新技术;2012年09期
8 冯嘉敏;李q，
本文编号：2464614
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2464614.html
