寻衅滋事罪存废之辨析
发布时间：2019-04-29 06:22
【摘要】：寻衅滋事罪作为危害社会管理秩序的罪名，在司法实践之中使用的频率相当高。由于本罪犯罪构成十分抽象，在判断的时候因为缺乏具体标准从而导致司法实践之中认定存在着不规范的现象。九七年刑法中的流氓罪因为存在“口袋罪”而被取消，但是现如今寻衅滋事罪却把适用范围越扩越大，俨然成为了新的“口袋罪”。在司法实践之中，往往存在着本来应当出罪最后却入罪或者明明构成犯罪却出罪的情况，伴随着这种情况的往往是司法人员主观意志的甚至是司法腐败。在现行寻衅滋事罪的犯罪构成之下，由于缺乏可以量化的标杆而导致司法人员主观性大大增强，容易致使冤假错案的发生。本文就寻衅滋事罪本身的构成要件进行分析并且对能否在刑法之中废除寻衅滋事罪来进行讨论，希望能在刑法之中彻底废除寻衅滋事罪，同时对本罪废除后应当采取的措施提出建议，藉此希望完善我国刑法体系，，达到最终保障人权的目的。是否废除寻衅滋事罪的讨论，是关于我国立法科学化和实现依法治国的重要保证。
[Abstract]:As a crime of endangering the social management order, the crime of aggression and nuisance is used frequently in judicial practice. Because the constitution of this crime is very abstract, because of the lack of specific standards in judgment, there is a phenomenon of irregularity in judicial practice. In 1997, the crime of hooliganism in criminal law was abolished because of the existence of "pocket crime", but now the crime of provoking and causing trouble has expanded the scope of application more and more, as if it had become a new "pocket crime". In judicial practice, there is always a situation that should have committed a crime at the end of the crime, or if it constitutes a crime, it is often accompanied by the subjective will of judicial personnel and even judicial corruption. Due to the lack of quantifiable benchmarking, the subjectivity of judicial personnel is greatly enhanced, which can easily lead to the occurrence of miscarriage of justice. This article analyzes the constituent elements of the crime of provoking and causing trouble and discusses whether it can be abolished in the criminal law, hoping that the crime of provoking and causing trouble can be completely abolished in the criminal law. At the same time, the author puts forward some suggestions on the measures to be taken after the abrogation of this crime in order to perfect the criminal law system of our country and to achieve the goal of protecting human rights finally. The discussion on whether to abolish the crime of provoking and causing trouble is an important guarantee for the scientific legislation and the realization of ruling the country according to law.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2468008
[Abstract]:As a crime of endangering the social management order, the crime of aggression and nuisance is used frequently in judicial practice. Because the constitution of this crime is very abstract, because of the lack of specific standards in judgment, there is a phenomenon of irregularity in judicial practice. In 1997, the crime of hooliganism in criminal law was abolished because of the existence of "pocket crime", but now the crime of provoking and causing trouble has expanded the scope of application more and more, as if it had become a new "pocket crime". In judicial practice, there is always a situation that should have committed a crime at the end of the crime, or if it constitutes a crime, it is often accompanied by the subjective will of judicial personnel and even judicial corruption. Due to the lack of quantifiable benchmarking, the subjectivity of judicial personnel is greatly enhanced, which can easily lead to the occurrence of miscarriage of justice. This article analyzes the constituent elements of the crime of provoking and causing trouble and discusses whether it can be abolished in the criminal law, hoping that the crime of provoking and causing trouble can be completely abolished in the criminal law. At the same time, the author puts forward some suggestions on the measures to be taken after the abrogation of this crime in order to perfect the criminal law system of our country and to achieve the goal of protecting human rights finally. The discussion on whether to abolish the crime of provoking and causing trouble is an important guarantee for the scientific legislation and the realization of ruling the country according to law.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘愫贞;;论明清立法语体的规范化特征[J];毕节学院学报;2010年03期
2 辛逸;;人民公社研究述评[J];当代中国史研究;2008年01期
3 陆煜颖;;从死而不僵的“流氓罪”看制度之弊[J];法制与社会;2011年35期
4 曹旅宁;秦律研究综述[J];广东教育学院学报;2002年01期
5 李云虹;;流氓罪的前世今生[J];法律与生活;2011年03期
6 于志刚;;口袋罪的时代变迁、当前乱象与消减思路[J];法学家;2013年03期
7 张成利;;寻衅滋事罪传统认定的缺陷[J];法制与社会;2013年32期
8 吴家林;;谈我国刑法寻衅滋事罪的完善[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年01期
9 李大勇;;谣言、言论自由与法律规制[J];法学;2014年01期
10 董绍静;;寻衅滋事罪此罪与彼罪的认定[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张维;寻衅滋事罪问题研究[D];吉林大学;2012年
本文编号：2468008
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2468008.html
