寻衅滋事罪认定研究
发布时间：2019-04-29 12:14
【摘要】：2011年5月1日开始实行的刑法修正案（八）对寻衅滋事罪的条文进行了修改，，但是并没能在明确性上使得寻衅滋事罪的认定问题有所改善。从刑法的社会调控机能来说，寻衅滋事罪的存在又是不可或缺的，是一种补充性的罪名。故我们应该在现存的法律背景下来探讨寻衅滋事罪，为解决寻衅滋事认定中的疑难问题提供有效的参考。 本文的正文部分包括三个部分内容： 第一部分本部分旨在探求寻衅滋事罪的立法渊源以及由来，再从概念上来理解什么是寻衅滋事，其次需要在了解寻衅滋事罪发展轨迹的背景下结合寻衅滋事的的立法目的和立法现状，为文章后面解决寻衅滋事的认定问题打下理论基础。 第二部分着重分析了寻衅滋事的四个犯罪构成要件，从寻衅滋事罪的主体、客体、主观方面入手理清思路，从客观行为模式和主观态度入手分析为什么寻衅滋事会在认定中存在难度。 在第三部分旨在探析寻衅滋事罪在实际操作中的疑难问题。特别是寻衅滋事罪是补充性罪名的性质，与一些犯罪在行为方式上相类似造成实践中在具体案件的处理上难以与其他犯罪明确地区分开。第三部分将结合目前的研究成果和一些地方性司法适用意见，给出区分寻衅滋事罪与其他犯罪的建议。
[Abstract]:The Criminal Law Amendment (VIII), which came into effect on May 1, 2011, amended the provisions of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, but it did not improve the identification of the crime of aggression and nuisance in terms of clarity. As far as the social regulation and control function of criminal law is concerned, the existence of the crime of provoking and causing trouble is indispensable and a supplementary crime. Therefore, we should explore the crime of provoking and causing trouble under the existing legal background, and provide effective reference for solving the difficult problems in the determination of provocative and troublesome matters. The main body of this paper consists of three parts: the first part aims to explore the legislative origin and origin of the crime of provocative and troublesome, and then to understand what is provocative and troublesome from the conceptual point of view. Secondly, under the background of understanding the development track of the crime of provocative and causing trouble, it is necessary to combine the legislative purpose and the current situation of the crime of provoking and causing trouble to lay a theoretical foundation for the determination of the problem of picking up quarrels and causing trouble in the later part of the article. The second part focuses on the analysis of the four elements of crime, from the subject, the object, the subjective aspects of the crime to clear up the train of thought. Starting with objective behavior pattern and subjective attitude, this paper analyzes why there are difficulties in identifying quarrels and troublemakers. In the third part, the purpose is to analyze the difficult problems in the practical operation of the crime of provoking and causing trouble. Especially, the crime of provoking and causing trouble is the nature of supplementary crime, which makes it difficult to separate the specific cases from other crimes in practice, which is similar to the behavior of some crimes. In the third part, according to the present research results and some opinions on the application of local justice, some suggestions are given to distinguish the crime of provoking and causing trouble from other crimes.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
[Abstract]:The Criminal Law Amendment (VIII), which came into effect on May 1, 2011, amended the provisions of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, but it did not improve the identification of the crime of aggression and nuisance in terms of clarity. As far as the social regulation and control function of criminal law is concerned, the existence of the crime of provoking and causing trouble is indispensable and a supplementary crime. Therefore, we should explore the crime of provoking and causing trouble under the existing legal background, and provide effective reference for solving the difficult problems in the determination of provocative and troublesome matters. The main body of this paper consists of three parts: the first part aims to explore the legislative origin and origin of the crime of provocative and troublesome, and then to understand what is provocative and troublesome from the conceptual point of view. Secondly, under the background of understanding the development track of the crime of provocative and causing trouble, it is necessary to combine the legislative purpose and the current situation of the crime of provoking and causing trouble to lay a theoretical foundation for the determination of the problem of picking up quarrels and causing trouble in the later part of the article. The second part focuses on the analysis of the four elements of crime, from the subject, the object, the subjective aspects of the crime to clear up the train of thought. Starting with objective behavior pattern and subjective attitude, this paper analyzes why there are difficulties in identifying quarrels and troublemakers. In the third part, the purpose is to analyze the difficult problems in the practical operation of the crime of provoking and causing trouble. Especially, the crime of provoking and causing trouble is the nature of supplementary crime, which makes it difficult to separate the specific cases from other crimes in practice, which is similar to the behavior of some crimes. In the third part, according to the present research results and some opinions on the application of local justice, some suggestions are given to distinguish the crime of provoking and causing trouble from other crimes.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 汤晓慰;寻衅滋事罪在司法适用中的若干疑难问题[J];法律适用(国家法官学院学报);2002年04期
2 张维;黄佳宇;;寻衅滋事罪司法困境之评析[J];法学杂志;2011年05期
3 潘志勇;姚t焧
本文编号：2468233
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2468233.html
