虚假诉讼罪适用问题研究
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the economic development and social transformation, there has been a surge in civil litigation cases. At the same time, various forms of false litigation have occurred frequently in judicial practice, which is even more prominent in economically developed areas such as Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, and so on. The Criminal Law Amendment (Nine) adds the crime of false litigation. This paper summarizes the difficult situation after the establishment of the crime of false litigation, and analyzes the above-mentioned problems from the angles of the constitution of crime, the form of crime, and so on. This paper combs the procedural problems of the connection between civil and criminal punishment, and finally puts forward some suggestions for regulating this crime. The main body of this paper is divided into three parts. The first part introduces the establishment and application dilemma of this crime. First of all, this paper briefly describes the background of the establishment of this crime, the background of social reform and punishment of breach of trust, the legislative urgency of breach of trust directly makes this crime into punishment. On the basis of the analysis of relevant data in judicial practice and the study of the judgment of the court, the author enumerates and explains the difficulties in applying the criminal punishment in the application of this crime to the high incidence of the case, the long cycle of the covert conviction in the case and the different applicable charges. The problems studied in this paper are put forward. The second part is the analysis of the reasons for the predicament of the application of this crime. In view of the dilemma in the application of the crime, this paper analyzes the definition of the crime, the understanding of the constitution of the crime and the dispute of the form of the crime, and discusses the connection between the civil and criminal punishment and the two kinds of false litigation in practice, which are difficult to identify, and so on. Try to clarify the essence of the dilemma of the application of this crime. The third part is the suggestion of regulating this crime. By enumerating the applicable predicament in the judicial practice of this crime, on the basis of analyzing the reasons of applying the dilemma, this paper clarifies the constituent elements of this crime, classifies the crime and establishes the linkage mechanism of public security bureau, procuratorate and court on the basis of information sharing. Put forward some suggestions to regulate this crime.
【学位授予单位】:中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 扎西;;防不胜防的虚假诉讼[J];检察风云;2009年18期
2 李荣梅;;虚假诉讼刑法规制思辨[J];学理论;2009年25期
3 李翡;;虚假诉讼行为探析与整治[J];法制与社会;2010年01期
4 尉兰琴;;试论虚假诉讼[J];陇东学院学报;2010年01期
5 赵赤;李燕山;;论虚假诉讼的刑法规制[J];江汉论坛;2010年02期
6 胡蓓;;论虚假诉讼的刑事可罚性及司法应对[J];法制与社会;2010年14期
7 薛玮;;当前民间借贷虚假诉讼案件的认定与防范[J];法制与社会;2010年15期
8 毕慧;;论民事虚假诉讼的法律规制[J];浙江学刊;2010年03期
9 范水清;;浅谈如何防范打击虚假诉讼[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2010年11期
10 梁婷;;民事虚假诉讼现状及其规制[J];黔南民族师范学院学报;2011年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 董小军 本报通讯员 陈海滨 舒沁;警惕虚假诉讼的欺诈[N];宁波日报;2009年
2 本报记者 袁定波;修正刑法解决对虚假诉讼制裁问题[N];法制日报;2009年
3 江苏省常州市天宁区人民法院 李霞;虚假诉讼现象亟待引起重视[N];人民法院报;2008年
4 本报记者 余建华 孟焕良;浙江 刑罚之剑指向虚假诉讼[N];人民法院报;2010年
5 本报记者 蒋萍 通讯员 吴禄婵;虚假诉讼可能涉及十宗罪[N];文汇报;2010年
6 媒体评论员 刘英团;以刑事制裁应对“虚假诉讼”[N];人民法院报;2010年
7 本报记者 白龙 张烁;多管齐下严打虚假诉讼[N];人民日报;2010年
8 黄廷旺 纪明龙;虚假诉讼的成因与防范[N];江苏经济报;2010年
9 本报记者 鲁晟;虚假诉讼:民事到刑事的嬗变[N];民主与法制时报;2010年
10 记者 刘慧静 通讯员 蒲华峰;虚假诉讼 缘何愈演愈烈[N];舟山日报;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张昕;虚假诉讼问题研究[D];苏州大学;2010年
2 谭慧;虚假诉讼成因与对策研究[D];贵州大学;2009年
3 许勤;从司法角度看虚假诉讼的刑法规制[D];华东政法大学;2010年
4 项卫兵;虚假诉讼行为的刑法规制[D];华东政法大学;2010年
5 郝元元;民事虚假诉讼研究[D];河南大学;2012年
6 王s,
本文编号:2475837
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2475837.html