论我国刑法中帮助行为实行化存在的问题与解决
发布时间：2019-05-23 10:52
【摘要】：帮助行为实行化是我国刑法理论界近年来热议的话题,尤其是在《刑法修正案(九)》出台之后,对此的讨论愈发频繁。帮助行为实行化,是指通过刑法分则的规定,将原本属于其他违法犯罪的帮助行为(包括中立帮助行为)规定为一个新的犯罪,并对其设置相应的罪名、罪状和法定刑,使其成为新罪的实行行为。具有刑法分则规定性、实质上的帮助性和处理上的实行性三个显著特征。帮助行为实行化在理论上存在争议,一方质疑其动摇共同犯罪的根基、舍弃构成要件类型性以及违背刑法的基本原则,另一方认同其有利于解决共犯中的处罚障碍、满足刑事政策中积极的一般预防目的、反映立法趋势以及迎合民众的法感情。帮助行为实行化已经在我国刑事立法中予以肯定,但其在我国刑事立法与司法实践中还存在不少问题,因此有必要从理论上提供解决我国刑法中帮助行为实行化现存问题的依据,并且提出具体的解决措施。以区分制共犯体系为基础,坚持罪责刑相适应原则和罪刑法定原则,并在限制积极的刑法立法观的层面上,为解决我国刑法中帮助行为实行化存在的问题提供了相应的理论依据。同时,还需要从确定帮助行为实行化的标准、罪名体系的科学化、合理配置法定刑以及区分适用实行化罪名与关联犯罪等具体措施予以解决。从而完善我国刑法中帮助行为实行化的理论框架,为刑事立法中规范此类立法现象以及刑事司法中准确地定罪、合理地量刑提供借鉴和参考。
[Abstract]:The practice of helping behavior is a hot topic in the theoretical circle of criminal law in our country in recent years, especially after the introduction of Amendment (9) of Criminal Law, the discussion of this topic has become more and more frequent. The implementation of aiding acts means that, through the provisions of the sub-provisions of the Criminal Law, the aiding acts (including neutral aiding acts), which originally belonged to other illegal crimes, are defined as a new crime, and the corresponding charges, counts and statutory penalties are imposed on them. Make it a new crime. It has three remarkable characteristics: the stipulation of criminal law, the assistance in essence and the practice in treatment. The implementation of aiding behavior is controversial in theory. One party questions its shaking the foundation of joint crime, abandons the type of constituent elements and violates the basic principles of criminal law, and the other side agrees that it is conducive to solving the punishment obstacles in accomplice. Meet the positive general purpose of prevention in criminal policy, reflect the legislative trend and cater to the legal feelings of the people. The implementation of helping behavior has been affirmed in the criminal legislation of our country, but there are still many problems in the criminal legislation and judicial practice of our country. Therefore, it is necessary to provide theoretical basis for solving the existing problems of helping behavior in criminal law of our country, and put forward concrete measures to solve the problem. On the basis of the system of distinguishing accomplices, adhere to the principle of adaptation of criminal responsibility and punishment and the principle of legality of crime and punishment, and on the level of restricting the positive legislative view of criminal law, It provides the corresponding theoretical basis for solving the problems existing in the implementation of helping behavior in the criminal law of our country. At the same time, it also needs to be solved from the determination of the standard of helping behavior, the scientific charge system, the reasonable allocation of legal punishment and the distinction between practical charges and related crimes. So as to perfect the theoretical framework of helping behavior in the criminal law of our country, and provide reference and reference for standardizing this kind of legislative phenomenon in criminal legislation and accurately conviction in criminal justice and reasonable sentencing.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2483841
[Abstract]:The practice of helping behavior is a hot topic in the theoretical circle of criminal law in our country in recent years, especially after the introduction of Amendment (9) of Criminal Law, the discussion of this topic has become more and more frequent. The implementation of aiding acts means that, through the provisions of the sub-provisions of the Criminal Law, the aiding acts (including neutral aiding acts), which originally belonged to other illegal crimes, are defined as a new crime, and the corresponding charges, counts and statutory penalties are imposed on them. Make it a new crime. It has three remarkable characteristics: the stipulation of criminal law, the assistance in essence and the practice in treatment. The implementation of aiding behavior is controversial in theory. One party questions its shaking the foundation of joint crime, abandons the type of constituent elements and violates the basic principles of criminal law, and the other side agrees that it is conducive to solving the punishment obstacles in accomplice. Meet the positive general purpose of prevention in criminal policy, reflect the legislative trend and cater to the legal feelings of the people. The implementation of helping behavior has been affirmed in the criminal legislation of our country, but there are still many problems in the criminal legislation and judicial practice of our country. Therefore, it is necessary to provide theoretical basis for solving the existing problems of helping behavior in criminal law of our country, and put forward concrete measures to solve the problem. On the basis of the system of distinguishing accomplices, adhere to the principle of adaptation of criminal responsibility and punishment and the principle of legality of crime and punishment, and on the level of restricting the positive legislative view of criminal law, It provides the corresponding theoretical basis for solving the problems existing in the implementation of helping behavior in the criminal law of our country. At the same time, it also needs to be solved from the determination of the standard of helping behavior, the scientific charge system, the reasonable allocation of legal punishment and the distinction between practical charges and related crimes. So as to perfect the theoretical framework of helping behavior in the criminal law of our country, and provide reference and reference for standardizing this kind of legislative phenomenon in criminal legislation and accurately conviction in criminal justice and reasonable sentencing.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘艳红;;网络中立帮助行为可罚性的流变及批判——以德日的理论和实务为比较基准[J];法学评论;2016年05期
2 王霖;;网络犯罪参与行为刑事责任模式的教义学塑造——共犯归责模式的回归[J];政治与法律;2016年09期
3 马荣春;徐晓霞;;平衡性立法思维:《刑法修正案(九)》的立法贡献[J];中国刑事法杂志;2016年04期
4 周光权;;积极刑法立法观在中国的确立[J];法学研究;2016年04期
5 黎宜春;;论帮助恐怖活动罪的法律适用——以反恐怖主义融资为视角[J];学术论坛;2016年05期
6 于冲;;帮助行为正犯化的类型研究与入罪化思路[J];政法论坛;2016年04期
7 于改之;蒋太珂;;刑事立法:在目的和手段之间——以《刑法修正案(九)》为中心[J];现代法学;2016年02期
8 孙万怀;;违法相对性理论的崩溃——对刑法前置化立法倾向的一种批评[J];政治与法律;2016年03期
9 张明楷;;论帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪[J];政治与法律;2016年02期
10 孙万怀;郑梦凌;;中立的帮助行为[J];法学;2016年01期
，本文编号：2483841
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2483841.html
