行政非诉执行问题研究
发布时间:2018-02-11 22:34
本文关键词: 行政强制执行 行政非诉执行 行政决定 出处:《湖南师范大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:2012年1月1日我国《行政强制法》正式开始施行,本法第2条规定我国行政强制分为行政强制措施与行政强制执行,而行政强制执行又可以分为两种方式:一是有行政强制执行权的行政机关自行执行的方式;二是没有行政强制执行权的行政机关申请人民法院执行的方式。其中,我国将行政机关申请人民法院执行的方式称之为行政非诉执行或非诉行政执行。行政非诉执行作为我国行政管理中非常重要的组成部分,创建于改革开放初期,该执行方式虽然经历了近三十年的发展,但由于该执行方式在设立初期缺乏理论上的支撑,运行过程中又缺少程序对其进行规范,从而致使其在实际应用中仍然存在比较多的问题。 在本文中,笔者首先通过对学者们的观点进行分析和总结,从而对我国行政非诉执行的概念、特征和性质提出自己的观点;然后对行政非诉执中存在的法理依据进行阐述,这部分主要是对分权制衡、权利救济和人权保障三大理论在行政非诉执行中发挥的作用进行归纳与总结;接着笔者在对我国相关案例和法律进行分析后,发现我国行政非诉执行存在人民法院审查标准不明晰、对行政相对人的救济不足和行政非诉执行和解混乱等问题;最后在借鉴国外行政非诉行实践经验和整理诸多学者理论的基础上,结合我国的《行政强制法》,笔者提出了设立执行听证制度、增加对行政相对人的救济措施和有限引入执行和解等举措,以期能够使我国行政非诉执行得以完善,进而达到保护行政相对人合法权益和防止权力滥用的目的。
[Abstract]:In January 1st 2012, the Administrative compulsory Law of our country came into force. Article 2 of this Law stipulates that administrative compulsion is divided into administrative coercive measures and administrative enforcement. And the administrative enforcement can be divided into two ways: one is the way that the administrative organ with the administrative enforcement power executes itself; the other is the way that the administrative organ without the administrative enforcement power applies to the people's court for execution. In our country, the way that administrative organs apply to people's courts for execution is called administrative non-action execution or non-litigation administrative execution. As a very important part of our country's administration, administrative non-litigation execution was established in the early stage of reform and opening up. Although the execution mode has been developing for nearly 30 years, it lacks theoretical support at the initial stage of its establishment, and lacks the program to regulate it during its operation. As a result, there are still many problems in practical application. In this paper, the author first analyzes and summarizes the views of scholars, and then puts forward his own views on the concept, characteristics and nature of administrative non-litigation enforcement in China, and then expounds the legal basis of administrative non-litigation enforcement. This part is mainly to sum up and summarize the functions of the three theories of separation of powers and checks and balances, rights relief and human rights protection in the implementation of administrative non-litigation; then the author analyzes the relevant cases and laws of our country. It is found that the standard of people's court examination is not clear, the relief to administrative counterpart is insufficient, and the administrative non-lawsuit enforcement is confused. Finally, on the basis of drawing lessons from foreign administrative non-litigation practice experience and sorting out many scholars' theories, combined with our country's "Administrative compulsory Law", the author puts forward the establishment of executive hearing system. We should increase the relief measures to the administrative counterpart and introduce some measures such as executive reconciliation, so as to perfect the administrative non-litigation execution in our country, and then to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and to prevent the abuse of power.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 林木扬;;论非诉行政执行的路径选择[J];法制与社会;2013年32期
2 杨朝程;钱昕;;关于行政非诉执行案件和解情况的分析——以基层法院相关调查为据[J];法制与社会;2012年31期
3 庄天逸;;论行政强制执行的法律救济[J];河北法学;2008年08期
4 刘颖;;行政公正与效率关系之探析[J];山西警官高等专科学校学报;2006年01期
5 姬亚平;行政强制执行模式研究及选择[J];理论导刊;2004年09期
6 沈开举;王红建;;试论行政强制执行权的分配模式[J];南京工业大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
7 张承安;韩轶明;;非诉行政执行制度的多向度审思[J];时代法学;2013年02期
8 刘宏成;;论我国行政公诉制度的构建[J];湖北警官学院学报;2013年07期
9 伊海燕;;行政强制执行制度与立法构想[J];长江大学学报(社科版);2013年05期
10 戴薇;;《行政强制法》实施后我国行政强制执行的适用问题[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2013年08期
,本文编号:1504158
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1504158.html