行政程序瑕疵的三分法与司法审查

发布时间：2018-03-07 17:45

  本文选题：行政程序瑕疵　切入点：三分法　出处：《法学家》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在行政程序法典阙如的情形下,我国新《行政诉讼法》担纲了规范行政程序瑕疵类型的重任。新法对行政程序瑕疵采取"违反法定程序"与"程序轻微违法"的二分法,忽略了司法实践中大量存在的第三种类型:不被撤销或确认违法,而是由法院予以指正并判决驳回诉讼请求的"狭义程序瑕疵"。在引入"狭义程序瑕疵"而形成三分法后,有必要在制度层面增设"忽略不计(视为合法)"的法律后果。同时,基于完善行政程序瑕疵的判决方式考虑,应排除撤销判决中部分撤销之适用、质疑责令重作判决不受限制之正当性、反对增设补正判决作为确认违法判决之从判决,还应防止法院因宽泛认定"狭义程序瑕疵"而大量作出驳回诉讼请求判决的现象。为此,应以"违反程度轻微且行政机关自行实施了有意义的补正"作为适用驳回判决的前提。
[Abstract]:In the absence of a code of administrative procedure, the new Administrative procedure Law of our country is responsible for standardizing the types of defects in administrative procedure. The new law adopts a dichotomy of "violating the legal procedure" and "the minor violation of the procedure". Neglecting the third type which exists extensively in judicial practice: the "narrow procedural defect", which is not revoked or recognized as illegal, but is corrected by the court and decided to reject the claim. After the introduction of the "narrow procedural defect" and the formation of the three-point law, It is necessary to add the legal consequences of "ignoring (considered as legal)" at the system level. At the same time, considering the judgment mode of perfecting the defects of administrative procedure, we should exclude the application of partial revocation in the annulment. To challenge the validity of ordering a new judgment to be repeated without restriction, to oppose the addition of a correction judgment as a subordinate judgment to confirm an illegal judgment, and to prevent the court from making a large number of judgments for rejecting a lawsuit request because of its broad determination of a "narrow procedural flaw". To this end, "minor violations and the agency's own implementation of meaningful corrections" should be taken as a prerequisite for the application of the decision.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学法学院;
【基金】：中荷合作项目“中国行政诉讼制度改革的理论与实践”(106-239067)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.1
，

本文编号：1580305