行政合同中行政优先权行使问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-08 11:33

本文选题：行政合同　切入点：行政优先权　出处：《中南大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：摘要：随着服务行政理念的发展,行政合同已逐步成为政府行政的重要方式。由于行政合同中行政色彩的“弱化”,行政主体基于公共利益享有行政优先权,较之传统行政优先权也形成了一种“弱化”,具有和传统行政优先权不同的特征。行政合同中行政优先权的正确行使,既关系到公共利益的实现,也关系到相对人的正当权益能否获得保护。因此行政主体在行政合同中的行政优先权不能任意行使,必须要有确定的行使原则和制度。一般而言,基于公共利益考虑是行政主体在行政合同中行使行政优先权的基础和前提,即只有当公共利益遭受较大损失时才能行使。行政合同作为权力意识和契约精神的契合,既具有契约性又具有行政性。行政合同行政性的一面表现在所有行政合同制度都应该受到行政法的基本原则、基本理论的约束。行政主体在行政合同中行使行政优先权也不例外,也应该遵守行政法的基本原则。特别是正当程序原则、公开原则和比例原则。正当程序原则使得行政主体在行政合同中行使行政优先权时必须符合程序正义的最低要求。公开原则使得相对人能够参与行政合同中行政优先权行使的整个过程,这对于保障相对人正当权益极具意义。比例原则能够限制行政主体在行政合同中滥用行政优先权,即在行使前必须做到必要的利益衡量。原则和理论对实践的指导具有抽象性,因此必须在其指导下要建立一系列具有操作性的具体制度。建立行政合同中行政优先权行使的听证制度,最大意义在于使得相对人能够参与到决定行政优先权行使的程序中来。建立行政合同中行政优先权行使的告知与协商制度,是贯彻行政合同契约性的必然要求,体现了行政主体与相对人的合意。建立行政合同中行政优先权行使的第三方评价制度,最大程度保证评价的客观、真实,从而抑制行政主体在行政合同中行使行政优先权的任意性。由于我国,关于行政合同的理论和实践尚不成熟,其中的行政优先权行使的具体制度设计更是刚刚起步,只存在于一些学者的只言片语或轻描淡写中,行政合同中行政优先权行使制度亟待具体化、系统化,在具体制度构建中,听证制度、告知与协商制度、评价制度是不可回避的重要内容,这对于正确行使行政优先权,维护相对人正当权益具有重大意义。
[Abstract]:Abstract: with the development of the concept of service administration, the administrative contract has gradually become an important way of government administration. Due to the "weakening" of the administrative color in the administrative contract, the administrative subject enjoys the administrative priority based on the public interest. Compared with the traditional administrative priority, it has formed a kind of "weakening" and has different characteristics from the traditional administrative priority. The correct exercise of administrative priority in administrative contract is not only related to the realization of public interest, but also to whether the legitimate rights and interests of relative person can be protected. Therefore, the administrative priority of administrative subject in administrative contract cannot be exercised arbitrarily. Generally speaking, the consideration of public interest is the basis and premise for administrative subject to exercise administrative priority in administrative contract, that is, only when the public interest suffers a great loss can it be exercised. As a combination of the consciousness of power and the spirit of contract, administrative contract is both contractual and administrative. The administrative aspect of administrative contract is that all administrative contract systems should be subject to the basic principles of administrative law. The restriction of the basic theory. The administrative subject exercising the administrative priority in the administrative contract is no exception, and should abide by the basic principles of administrative law, especially the principle of due process, Principle of publicity and principle of proportionality. Due process principle makes it necessary for administrative subject to meet the minimum requirements of procedural justice when exercising administrative priority in administrative contract. The principle of openness enables counterpart to participate in the administration of administrative contract. The whole process of exercising priority, The principle of proportionality can limit the abuse of administrative priority by the administrative subject in the administrative contract, that is to say, the necessary benefits must be measured before exercising. The principles and theories are abstract to the practice, so we must establish a series of operable concrete systems under the guidance of the principles and theories, and establish the hearing system of the administrative priority in the administrative contract. The greatest significance lies in enabling the relative person to participate in the procedure of determining the exercise of administrative priority. It is an inevitable requirement to carry out the contractual nature of administrative contract to establish the system of notification and consultation for the exercise of administrative priority in administrative contract. It embodies the agreement of the administrative subject and the relative person. The third party evaluation system of the administrative priority in the administrative contract is established to ensure the objectivity and truth of the evaluation to the greatest extent. Therefore, the arbitrariness of administrative subject exercising administrative priority in administrative contract is restrained. Because of our country, the theory and practice of administrative contract are not mature, and the concrete system design of administrative priority exercise is just beginning, which only exists in some scholars' words or understatement. The system of exercising administrative priority in administrative contract is urgent to be concretized and systematized. In the construction of specific system, the system of hearing, informing and consultation, and evaluation system are the important contents that cannot be avoided, which is important for the correct exercise of administrative priority. It is of great significance to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the counterpart.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】