盐业垄断的司法破除与局限--从指导性案例5号鲁潍案的影响与后续发展谈起

发布时间：2018-03-08 22:34

本文选题：指导性案例　切入点：盐业体制改革　出处：从指导性案例5号鲁潍案的影响与后续发展谈起　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：指导性案例5号鲁潍案自发布之日起便受到学界和实务界的广泛关注。鲁潍案一方面强调了法院对规章的有限审查权,另一方面也体现了司法对于破除盐业垄断体制的推动作用。然而该案发布近五年来,其指导司法适用的情况与最高人民法院的预期颇有不同。尽管鲁潍案对后续盐业管理领域行政诉讼案件的审理产生了重大影响,但这种影响部分来自于对鲁潍案裁判要点的遵循甚至超越,部分来自于法院对地方规定的变通解释。盐业行政主管部门对于鲁潍案的判决也采取了相应的对策,执法手段的变化使得该领域案件的讨论已经不再停留于鲁潍案本身,而是牵涉到越来越多的法律问题,对鲁潍案的适用提出了新的挑战,也导致工业盐管理领域的管制即便在鲁潍案发布之后仍以新的形式进行。这种现象是我国盐业管理体制的内在局限造成的,这也对我国目前正在进行的盐业体制改革提出了新的启示和要求。
[Abstract]:The guiding case No. 5, Luwei case, has received extensive attention from academic and practical circles since it was published. On the one hand, the Luwei case emphasizes the limited power of the court to review the regulations. On the other hand, it also reflects the role of the judiciary in breaking down the salt monopoly system. However, in the nearly five years since the case was published, Its guidance on judicial application is quite different from the expectations of the Supreme people's Court. Although the Luwei case has had a significant impact on the subsequent trials of administrative litigation cases in the field of salt industry management, However, this kind of influence comes from following and even surpassing the judgment points of Luwei case, and partly from the flexible interpretation of local regulations by the court. The salt industry administrative department has also taken corresponding countermeasures to the judgment in Luwei case. The change of law enforcement means makes the discussion of cases in this field no longer remain in the Luwei case itself, but involves more and more legal issues, which poses a new challenge to the application of the Luwei case. It also leads to new forms of regulation in the field of industrial salt management even after the publication of the Luwei case. This phenomenon is caused by the inherent limitations of the management system of China's salt industry. This also put forward new enlightenment and request to the salt industry system reform that our country is carrying on at present.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“构建中国特色案例制度的综合系统研究”(项目编号:16ZDA068)的研究成果之一
【分类号】：D922.16;D920.5

【相似文献】