重大行政决策问责机制研究

发布时间：2018-03-09 19:32

本文选题：重大行政决策　切入点：决策机制　出处：《广西师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在当今社会,行政机关在管理公共事务的广度与深度不断扩大,对公共利益和公民权利的影响更是不容忽视。规范与制约行政机关重大行政决策的运行业已成为建设法治政府的题中之义,而重大行政决策问责机制则是其中的重要保障和前提。本文综合运用比较研究、文献资料、实证研究等方法,从重大行政决策的概念及基本问题谈起,梳理重大行政决策的理论依据及国内外实践和理论研究现状,分析当前我国重大行政决策问责机制存在的问题,并结合我国国情,提出完善重大行政决策问责机制的对策。当前我国重大行政决策问责机制建设要从规范问责立法、明确问责主体、完善问责程序等方面着手改革。只有在各方面共同作用下,才有可能建立起我国新型的现代重大行政决策问责机制体系。本文的主体部分共六章。第一章是导论,该部分直接提出了论文的主题,简单地阐述了行政决策问责的学术背景、国内外研究现状及论文的研究方法。第二章为重大行政决策问责机制的概述。首先对重大行政决策的概念进行界定,重点论述何谓“重大”,分析判断重大行政决策事项的范围;其次,在研究相关文献和结合社会实践的基础上,明确重大行政决策问责机制的含义,为下文重大行政决策问责机制涉及的相关理论描述提供衔接。第三章主要介绍重大行政决策问责机制的理论依据及要素,通过对相关理论的分析来明确重大行政决策问责机制的理论性、科学性及必要性,为后文重大行政决策问责机制存在问题的法治实践及改善提供相应的理论支持。第四章和第五章是本文的重点内容,同时也是前后相互衔接的内容。第四章从问责立法、问责主体、问责客体、问责程序等四方面剖析当下我国构建重大行政决策问责机制存在的现实问题,为下文进一步探讨重大行政决策问责机制作铺垫。文章第五章则是针对上文所提到机制建设中所遇到的问题,一一对应的尝试探讨解决策略。一方面是制定统一的行政问责法,明确重大行政决策问责的合法性、规范性,积极有效的引导中国重大行政决策问责机制的建立;另一方面就是从明确问责主体和客体着手,论述重大行政决策问责具体应该“由谁问责”、“对谁问责”等方面的问题;再者,基于前文研究,确定问责实施的具体程序,完善行政决策问责的执行方式。最后,文章第六章则在研究的基础上,针对中国重大行政决策问责机制的构建提出粗浅的策略和建议。
[Abstract]:In today's society, the scope and depth of the administration of public affairs is constantly expanding. The influence on public interest and citizen's rights can't be ignored. Standardizing and restricting the operation of major administrative decisions of administrative organs has become the meaning of the construction of a government ruled by law. The accountability mechanism of major administrative decision making is an important guarantee and premise. This paper discusses the concept and basic problems of major administrative decision making by means of comparative study, literature and empirical research, etc. Combing the theoretical basis of major administrative decisions and the current situation of domestic and foreign practice and theoretical research, analyzing the problems existing in the accountability mechanism of major administrative decisions in China, and combining with the national conditions of our country, This paper puts forward the countermeasures to perfect the accountability mechanism of major administrative decision making. At present, the construction of accountability mechanism for major administrative decision making in our country should start from the aspects of standardizing the legislation of accountability, clarifying the subject of accountability, perfecting the accountability procedure, and so on. The main body of this paper is six chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, this part puts forward the theme of the thesis directly, and simply expounds the academic background of the administrative decision-making accountability. The second chapter is an overview of the accountability mechanism of major administrative decision making. Firstly, the concept of major administrative decision is defined, with emphasis on what is "significant" and the scope of judging the major administrative decision. Secondly, on the basis of studying relevant literature and combining with social practice, the meaning of accountability mechanism of major administrative decision-making is clarified. The third chapter mainly introduces the theoretical basis and elements of the accountability mechanism of major administrative decision-making. Through the analysis of relevant theories to clarify the theoretical, scientific and necessary of the accountability mechanism of major administrative decisions, It provides corresponding theoretical support for the practice of the rule of law and improvement of the accountability mechanism of the major administrative decision-making. Chapter 4th and chapter 5th are the key contents of this paper, and they are also the contents that link up with each other. Chapter 4th is the legislation of accountability. Four aspects of accountability subject, accountability object and accountability procedure are analyzed to analyze the practical problems existing in the construction of major administrative decision-making accountability mechanism in China. Chapter 5th is to discuss the problems encountered in the construction of the mechanism mentioned above, and try to explore the solution strategy one by one. On the one hand, it is to establish a unified administrative accountability law. To clarify the legitimacy, standardization and effective guidance of the establishment of the accountability mechanism for major administrative decisions; on the other hand, to start with a clear definition of the subject and object of accountability, This paper discusses the specific issues of "who should be held accountable" and "who should be held accountable" to the accountability of major administrative decisions; furthermore, based on the previous research, it determines the specific procedures for the implementation of accountability, and consummates the mode of implementation of the accountability of administrative decision-making. On the basis of the research, Chapter 6th puts forward some basic strategies and suggestions for the construction of accountability mechanism for major administrative decisions in China.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】