当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

多车相撞交通事故赔偿责任问题的研究

发布时间:2018-03-11 17:05

  本文选题:多车相撞交通事故 切入点:责任主体 出处:《沈阳师范大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法》实施以来,虽规定了交通事故抢救费用垫付、无责赔付等人性化条款,但由于机动车所有人与实际的运行控制、运行收益分离以及道路交通事故损害赔偿的分配标准存在争议,使具体实施过程中困难重重。 本文以真实案例为基础,从适用现有法律解决现有问题为主线,对案件处理过程中存在的如何准确认定多车相撞交通事故损害赔偿的责任主体、如何最大限度地使机动车交通事故造成的损失在责任主体之间乃至全社会得以合理分担以及程序问题进行分析,通过探寻《道路交通安全法》《机动车交通强制责任保险条例》的立法背景及目的,并结合《侵权责任法》的精神正确适用《道路交通安全法》第76条,并归纳出一套解决多车相撞交通事故现存问题的科学的法律适用理论及方法,以解决交通事故中的责任分担,以期达到对事故涉及的各方法律主体利益的均衡,给司法审判实务以借鉴。首先,关于多车相撞交通事故责任主体确定的问题。第一,保险公司“无责赔付”的适用问题,从交强险的功能定位以及利害相关人的影响分析论述“无责赔付”之必要;第二责任主体认定问题,通过原因分析与法律分析找到解决问题的根源,并提出相应的解决方案。其次,多车相撞交通事故损害赔偿的分配问题。对于分配比例问题,通过正确认识事故责任与赔偿责任的关系,去伪存真,,正确认识问题,提出解决问题方法;对于多方受害人交强险范围内受偿权的保障,从法律规定与司法实践存在差距入手,在现有法律基础上,寻求司法实践中缩小差距有效途径。最后,多车相撞交通事故损害赔偿的程序问题。无责机动车一方是否列为或追加为共同被告或第三人参加诉讼。从被告当事人适格的判定入手,寻求保护无责机动车一方诉讼权利及节约其成本的解决方案。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the people's Republic of China, although it has stipulated humanized clauses such as advance payment of rescue expenses for traffic accidents, no liability compensation, but due to the owners of motor vehicles and the actual operation control, The separation of operating income and the allocation standard of compensation for road traffic accidents are controversial, which makes the concrete implementation difficult. On the basis of real cases, from the application of the existing law to solve the existing problems as the main line, how to accurately determine how to accurately identify the main body of liability for damage compensation in the multi-vehicle collision traffic accident in the course of handling the case. How to maximize the loss caused by motor vehicle traffic accidents between the main body of responsibility and even the whole society can be reasonably shared, as well as the analysis of the procedures, By exploring the legislative background and purpose of the regulations on compulsory liability Insurance for Motor vehicles in the Road Traffic Safety Law, and combining the spirit of the Tort liability Law, the article 76 of the Road Traffic Safety Law is applied correctly. A set of scientific applicable theories and methods to solve the existing problems of multi-vehicle collision traffic accidents are summarized in order to solve the burden sharing in traffic accidents, in order to achieve the balance of the interests of the parties involved in the accidents. First of all, about the problem of determining the subject responsible for multi-vehicle collision traffic accident. First, the application of "non-liability indemnity" in insurance company. This paper discusses the necessity of "non-liability compensation" from the function orientation of traffic insurance and the influence of stakeholders, and finds out the root cause of the problem through cause analysis and legal analysis. And put forward the corresponding solution. Secondly, the distribution problem of compensation for damage caused by multi-vehicle collision traffic accident. For the problem of allocation ratio, through correctly understanding the relationship between accident liability and liability for compensation, we can distinguish false things, preserve the real things, and correctly understand the problem. Put forward the solution to the problem; for the protection of the right to compensation within the scope of multiple victims' traffic insurance, start with the gap between the legal provisions and judicial practice, and seek an effective way to narrow the gap in the judicial practice on the basis of the existing laws. The procedural problem of compensation for damage caused by a multi-vehicle collision traffic accident. Is the party not liable for the motor vehicle listed or added to the action for the co-defendant or the third party. To seek solutions to protect the litigant rights of non-liable motor vehicle and save its cost.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.14;D923

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘学生;;交强险立法与实践的两个法律问题辨析——以侵权责任法律关系为视角[J];保险研究;2011年09期

2 宁乐然;;论交通事故责任与交通事故损害赔偿责任的辩证关系[J];法学杂志;2007年04期

3 郑雅方;周国均;张永坡;;论因果关系理论在交通事故责任认定中的应用——兼论交通事故责任划分标准的瑕疵及矫正[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2007年06期

4 张迅雷;;机动车道路交通事故民事损害赔偿若干问题研究——以实际案例为研究载体[J];北京工业职业技术学院学报;2012年04期

5 姜强;;交强险的功能定位及其与侵权责任的关系——审理机动车交通事故损害赔偿案件的制度背景[J];法律适用;2013年01期

6 杨良胜;黄飞;;被保险人承担的连带责任保险公司不应赔偿[J];人民司法;2011年08期

7 李中原;;论机动车所有人与使用人的责任承担机制——关于《侵权责任法》第49条和第52条的再思考[J];苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年06期

8 段丽丽;;论交通事故损害赔偿责任承担及主体确定[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2009年02期

9 管启飞;;交通事故人身损害赔偿责任比例问题研究[J];赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版);2011年05期

10 王卫国;冯昆英;;多车连环相撞与“交强险”赔付[J];中国保险;2012年02期



本文编号:1599093

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1599093.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1f3e1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com