环境法本位的反思及环境法多元化保障手段

发布时间：2018-03-11 22:23

本文选题：环境法　切入点：法的本位　出处：《政法论丛》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目前我国环境法学界对环境法的本位这一主题的解读多是在实证、工具层面的,此与传统法理学在应然价值层面探究法的本位问题的思路是相左的;同时,有关环境法本位的误读和争议又进一步引发了学界在实在法律规则层面对环境法保障手段的"单一化"的解读。这显然不利于准确定位环境法的价值目标,也有碍于环境法律体系的合理构建。环境法学界应回归部门法理学之本里,从价值层面确立并正确解读环境法的权利本位,并以之为基础正视环境法的"多元化"保障手段及其配合机制。具体来看该配合机制表现为"一体两翼一支撑":即环境行政权力是核心保障手段;社会环境权力和自然人环境权利是辅助保障手段;环境义务是环境法各保障手段的支撑。
[Abstract]:At present, the interpretation of the theme of the standard of environmental law in the field of environmental law in our country is mostly at the level of demonstration and tool, which is different from the idea of exploring the standard problem of law in the level of natural value of traditional jurisprudence; at the same time, The misreading and controversy about the standard of environmental law further lead to the "unitary" interpretation of the means of environmental protection in the academic circles at the level of positive legal rules, which is obviously not conducive to the accurate positioning of the value goal of environmental law. It also hinders the rational construction of the environmental legal system. The environmental law field should return to the foundation of departmental jurisprudence and establish and correctly interpret the right standard of environmental law from the value level. And on the basis of this, we should face up to the "pluralistic" safeguard means of environmental law and its coordination mechanism, which is shown as "one body, two wings and one support": that is, the environmental administrative power is the core safeguard means; Social environmental rights and natural environmental rights are auxiliary safeguards, and environmental obligations are the support of environmental law.
【作者单位】：福州大学法学院;
【基金】：福建省教育厅项目“生态文明社会生态保护法律体系建构”(JAS150133)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.68

【相似文献】