当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

论行政指导争议的司法救济

发布时间:2018-03-13 11:22

  本文选题:行政指导 切入点:司法救济 出处:《大连海事大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:行政指导制度以其柔性的管理方法,被大多数国家广泛运用,同时对社会的发展产生了积极的影响。在改革开放之初,我国的政府也看到了行政指导对社会发展的重要作用,但当时计划经济给社会造成不良的影响仍就存在,致使行政指导制度的发展一度比较缓慢。如今,改革开放已取得了巨大成果,经济社会有了较大提高,但要想经济社会能持续增长,也就需要我国加快法治化脚步,这就对政府管理水平要求会更高,现实要求政府在行政管理过程让普通大众广泛参与进来。此时,我们的邻居日本行政指导已经基本健全,行政指导在行政管理领域,尤其是经济领域发挥了特殊的调整作用,其他国家也看到了该制度所具有的优势,也纷纷采纳并运用该行政管理手段,都取得不错的效果。当然,我国政府也进一步认识到行政指导制度的运用不能再迟缓,其灵活性和积极性一定能保证经济社会的稳步增长,要打破传统思维,从2000年至今,我国中央政府机关纷纷出台各种指导性文件,提倡地方政府在社会管理活动实施行政指导,在各领域都取得了良好的效果。 但是,我国行政指导制度在运用中还存在诸多的不足,产生行政指导争议时常发生,与行政指导有关的纠纷也一时无法妥善解决,行政指导应有的作用无法发挥。行政指导的实施大多数以指导性文件为依据,并没有从立法上对其实体内容、程序步骤以及救济方式予以确立。行政指导在实务中的负面问题,也引起了许多学者对行政指导的探究。行政指导的缺陷,一方面是由于行政指导制度的不完善,更重要的是对行政指导争议缺乏有效的司法救济途径。无论是学术界,还是立法上,都对行政指导争议是否给予司法救济的途径意见不统一。笔者尝试论证行政指导争议司法救济的理论基础和必要性,表明我国构建该制度完全是可行的。同时,总结行政指导制度实践中的多方面问题,指出我国行政指导司法救济现状,在此基础上表明给予行政指导争议司法救济制度的必要性和迫切性。最后,考察他国行政指导司法救济的建立情况,研究可供借鉴的经验,构建我国的行政指导争议司法救济体系,以保障相对人的合法权益,进一步实现法治行政。
[Abstract]:The administrative guidance system, with its flexible management method, is widely used in most countries and has a positive impact on the development of society. At the beginning of reform and opening up, our government also saw the important role of administrative guidance in social development. However, at that time, the planned economy had a negative impact on society, resulting in a relatively slow development of the administrative guidance system. Today, great achievements have been made in the reform and opening up, and the economy and society have been greatly improved. However, if we want to achieve sustained economic and social growth, we need our country to speed up the pace of rule of law. This will require a higher level of government management. The reality requires the government to involve the general public extensively in the administrative process. At this time, Our neighbor, Japan, has basically perfected its administrative guidance, which has played a special adjustment role in the field of administration, especially in the economic field. Other countries have also seen the advantages of this system. They have also adopted and used the administrative means one after another, and have achieved good results. Of course, our government has further realized that the application of the administrative guidance system cannot be delayed any longer, and that its flexibility and enthusiasm will surely ensure steady economic and social growth. In order to break the traditional thinking, from 2000 to now, the central government organs of our country have issued various guiding documents one after another, advocating the local government to carry out the administrative guidance in the social management activities, which has achieved good results in all fields. However, there are still many deficiencies in the application of the administrative guidance system in our country. Disputes about administrative guidance often occur, and disputes related to administrative guidance cannot be resolved properly for the time being. The implementation of administrative guidance is mostly based on the guiding documents, and does not establish its substantive content, procedural steps and relief methods from the legislative point of view, and the negative problems in the practice of the administrative guidance. The defects of the administrative guidance are due to the imperfection of the administrative guidance system and, more importantly, the lack of effective judicial remedies to the disputes over administrative guidance. The author tries to prove the theoretical basis and necessity of the judicial remedy of administrative guidance dispute, which indicates that it is completely feasible to construct this system in our country. This paper summarizes the various problems in the practice of administrative guidance system, points out the present situation of judicial relief of administrative guidance in China, and on this basis indicates the necessity and urgency of giving administrative guidance to dispute judicial relief system. This paper reviews the establishment of judicial relief under administrative guidance in other countries, studies the experiences that can be used for reference, and constructs the judicial relief system of administrative guidance disputes in our country in order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of relative persons and further realize the administration by law.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.1;D925.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 杨解君;中国入世与行政诉讼制度变革[J];法学;2002年04期

2 刘晓莉;;刍议行政指导救济制度的完善[J];法制与社会;2009年25期

3 窦义;浅析我国行政指导的司法救济[J];甘肃农业;2005年03期

4 邢晓东;从行政权与司法权的关系看行政诉讼受案范围[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2003年01期

5 包红光;;我国行政指导司法救济制度的构建[J];湖南科技学院学报;2010年03期

6 吴国干;行政指导与依法行政[J];国家行政学院学报;2001年04期

7 章志远;行政指导新论[J];法学论坛;2005年05期

8 张杰;;法学视野下的行政指导问题分析[J];商丘师范学院学报;2008年07期

9 刘铮;试析行政指导的可诉性[J];山西高等学校社会科学学报;2002年03期

10 湛中乐;日本《行政程序法》立法背景探析[J];中外法学;1995年04期



本文编号:1606186

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1606186.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户80227***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com