物权化的渔业权保护

发布时间：2018-03-20 23:35

本文选题：渔业权保护　切入点：物权化　出处：《暨南大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：长久以来，渔业者依水作业，在沿岸水域细心耕耘，推动着国民经济的发展及满足了国民对高蛋白物质的需求。众所周知，沿岸渔业具有高收入的同时也具有机动性低、作业区域受限等特点，而随着我国经济的发展，诸如海洋污染事故、水下光缆铺设、海港建设等经济开发利用行为不断侵害着渔业者对沿岸水域开发利用的权利。渔业权一直以来被认定是附属于行政权力的权利，在国家行为的主导下，无论是许可的撤销抑或征收、征用行为，渔业者都不能主张其权利；《物权法》出台后在用益物权篇规定了养殖权和捕捞权，却未规定渔业权制度，其原因主要是对渔业权的权利属性、性质及与现有法律制度的协调没有确论，由此，渔业权未有物权化的保护。渔业权制度的目的是对沿岸水域的综合利用、水产资源保护，并在此范围内给予渔业者对水域排他使用的权利以保障沿岸渔业者的权益。本文立足于在私法上对渔业权保护进行研究，为渔业权制度的完善提供有益的建议。第一部分，对渔业权的基本法理进行阐述，用以确立论文的理论基础。渔业权的概念一直以来是理论界争论不休的问题，尤其是对渔业权的主体及客体界定不清。本文在综合国内外研究的基础上对此理论问题进行概述，寻得渔业权的物权化保护理论根据，以为文章论证铺垫。第二部分，提出我国渔业权在现阶段上存在的问题与原因。我国渔业权保护的现实问题是：渔业权变动制度问题凸显、保护方法不足与期限和登记制度的欠缺，其主要原因是渔业权在立法上的缺失与在理论上对渔业权法律性质的认识不足。第三部分，分析物权化的渔业权保护的可行性。渔业权保护是否可行需在两个层级上进行分析:一是理论上具有可行性；二是能够与我国现行相关制度进行衔接。其后，通过对域外渔业权保护的考察研究，也证明出渔业权保护存在的现实可能。第四部分，《物权法》未能规定渔业权制度，是立法上的一大缺憾，以致现实中对渔业法律关系的调整仍然延续着行政权力规制的主导，在此枷锁的桎梏下难以实现权利的放飞。本部分以维护渔业者权益为目标，通过渔业权的物权化制度构建以作为渔业权制度设立的建议。
[Abstract]:For a long time, fishers have worked in accordance with water and cultivated carefully in coastal waters, which has promoted the development of the national economy and satisfied the people's demand for high-protein substances. As we all know, coastal fisheries have high incomes and low mobility. With the development of our country's economy, such as marine pollution accident, underwater optical cable laying, seaport construction and other economic exploitation and utilization behavior, the fishery's rights of exploitation and utilization of coastal waters have been continuously infringed. Fishery right has always been regarded as the right attached to administrative power. Under the guidance of state behavior, whether the revocation of permission, expropriation or expropriation, After the publication of the Real right Law, the aquaculture and fishing rights are stipulated in the usufruct right, but not the fishery right system, which is mainly due to the property of the fishery right. The nature and coordination with the existing legal system are uncertain, thus, the fishery rights are not protected in rem. The purpose of the fishery rights system is the comprehensive utilization of coastal waters and the protection of aquatic resources, To protect the rights and interests of the coastal fisheries, this paper is based on the research on the protection of fishery rights in private law, and provides useful suggestions for the improvement of fishery rights system. In the first part, the basic legal theory of fishery right is expounded to establish the theoretical basis of the paper. The concept of fishery right has always been a controversial issue in the theoretical circle. In particular, the definition of the subject and object of fishery right is not clear. This paper summarizes this theoretical problem on the basis of synthesizing domestic and foreign research, and finds the theoretical basis for the protection of fishery right in real right, thus laying the groundwork for the article to demonstrate. In the second part, the author points out the existing problems and reasons of fishery right in our country at the present stage. The realistic problems of fishery right protection in our country are as follows: the change system of fishery right is prominent, the method of protection is insufficient and the time limit and the lack of registration system are not enough. The main reasons are the lack of legislation and the lack of understanding of the legal nature of fishery rights in theory. The third part analyzes the feasibility of the protection of fishery rights in real right. The feasibility of fishery right protection needs to be analyzed at two levels: one is theoretically feasible; the other is to be able to link up with the current relevant system of our country. Through the investigation and research on the protection of fishery right, it is proved that the protection of fishery right exists in reality. In the 4th part, the failure of the Real right Law to regulate the fishery right system is a major shortcoming in the legislation, so that the adjustment of the fishery legal relationship in reality still continues the leading role of the administrative power regulation. It is difficult to realize the release of the right under the shackles of this yoke. This part aims at safeguarding the rights and interests of the fishery, and constructs the system of fishery rights as the suggestion of the establishment of the fishery right system by means of the system of the real right of the fishery right.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.2;D922.4

【参考文献】