食品安全惩罚性赔偿制度新探

发布时间：2018-03-28 04:02

本文选题：食品安全法　切入点：惩罚性赔偿　出处：《上海师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：食品安全牵涉千家万户,每一次食品类的法律出台都受到整个社会的高度关注,自2009年《中华人民共和国食品安全法》出台,到2015年修订《食品安全法》,惩罚性赔偿制度就一直受到热议。惩罚性赔偿制度,本身就是一个充满争议的制度,它起源于英美法系,但是英美法系对这个制度也是有着较大的争议,大陆法系的国家基本还没有接受该制度,只是在一定程度上不再像以前那么反对惩罚性赔偿制度。我国在《食品安全法》中引入该制度,在全国范围内,不管是专家学者,又或者是普通公民,对此基本没有什么反对的声音。但是,在具体的实践过程中,由于我国并没有很坚实的法律理论作为支撑,导致该制度在现实适用中遇到了很多问题,例如赔偿金的确定,该制度调整的主体范围等都出现了争议,为此在现实中也出现了同案不同判的情况。本文结构一共分为五个部分,第一章是该制度适用的背景,国内外的一些研究现状等,以加强对该制度的发展及现状的了解。第二章介绍了该制度的一些基本概念以及该制度的自身价值的体现。第三章具体介绍了该制度在我国《食品安全法》中的适用。在实践中,关于惩罚性赔偿金的合理确定,制度调整的主体,精神损害赔偿金的缺失等方面,都存在不同程度的问题。第四章介绍了美国以及我国台湾地区的食品安全惩罚性赔偿制度,并加以分析。之所以选择美国和台湾地区的该制度,是由于该制度起源于英美法系,美国是世界上该制度发展的最成熟的国家,而台湾是对于该制度本土化做的较好的地区。第五章则是针对该制度在我国存在的问题,提出将销售者的重大过失行为纳入调整,确定弹性赔偿金,从赔偿金中征收一定比例以建立相关基金,引入公益诉讼,以及增加精神损害赔偿金等建议。
[Abstract]:Food safety involves thousands of households. Every time the food law is issued, the whole society pays close attention to it. Since 2009, the Food Safety Law of the people's Republic of China has been issued. By the time the Food Safety Act was amended in 2015, the punitive damages system has been the subject of heated discussion. The punitive damages system itself is a controversial system that originated in the Anglo-American legal system. However, the Anglo-American legal system is also controversial. Countries in the civil law system have basically not accepted the system. But to a certain extent, we are no longer as opposed to the punitive damages system as we used to be. Our country introduced this system in the Food Safety Law. Throughout the country, whether it is experts or scholars, or ordinary citizens, However, in the concrete practice process, because our country does not have the very solid legal theory as the support, causes this system to meet many problems in the practical application, for example, the determination of the compensation. The scope of the adjustment of the system has been controversial, and different judgments of the same case have also appeared in reality. The structure of this paper is divided into five parts. The first chapter is the background of the application of the system, and some domestic and foreign research status, etc. In order to strengthen the understanding of the development and present situation of the system, the second chapter introduces some basic concepts of the system and the embodiment of its own value. The third chapter introduces the system in the Food Safety Law of our country. Applicable... in practice, There are some problems about the reasonable determination of punitive damages, the subject of system adjustment, the lack of compensation for spiritual damages, etc. The fourth chapter introduces the food safety punitive damages system in the United States and Taiwan. The reason for choosing the system in the United States and Taiwan is that the system originated from the common law system, and the United States is the most mature country in the world for the development of this system. However, Taiwan is a good place for the localization of the system. The fifth chapter is aimed at the problems existing in the system in China, and proposes to bring the gross negligence of the sellers into the adjustment and determine the flexible compensation. Some suggestions such as setting up related funds, introducing public interest litigation, and increasing compensation for mental damages are proposed by levying a certain proportion of compensation.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.16

【参考文献】