医疗事故纠纷解决制度问题研究
发布时间:2018-03-28 04:11
本文选题:医疗事故纠纷 切入点:解决制度 出处:《广西大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:医疗事故纠纷如今已经成为当代热议的话题,但是如何得到有效妥善的解决也一直是实践中的难点。医疗事故纠纷是一种特殊性的民事纠纷,特定的内容决定了与其他纠纷的本质区别,特殊的属性也决定了医疗事故纠纷解决制度的特点。然而,正是由于医疗事故纠纷解决制度的特殊之处的衍生了现行的解决制度所存在的局限性问题。 本文旨在解决医疗事故解决制度的特殊性问题,分析现行医疗事故纠纷解决制度的局限性,提出完善意见。本文采用并列式结构,按照医疗事故纠纷三种解决方式为内容分成三个部分,每个部分均从相应的医疗事故纠纷解决方式的定义入手,分析其特点,分析了其局限性,从而分别形成了笔者在规定和解协议效力、允许医疗顾问参与和解,设立第三方调解制度,立法增强患者举证能力、规定病历遗失责任、规定因果关系举证责任、限制法官鉴定机构选择权方面的完善意见。本文全面的分析了医疗事故纠纷解决制度的相关问题,重点探讨了我国法律在此问题上的规定和不足,并提出了相应的完善意见。希望能够引起实务界与理论界对此问题的进一步关注与探讨,确实完善我国的医疗事故纠纷解决制度,使医疗事故纠纷能够得到妥善有效的解决。
[Abstract]:Medical malpractice dispute has become a hot topic nowadays, but how to solve it effectively and properly has always been a difficult point in practice. Medical malpractice dispute is a special civil dispute. The specific content determines the essential difference from other disputes, and the special attribute also determines the characteristics of the medical accident dispute resolution system. It is because of the particularity of medical malpractice dispute resolution system that the limitation of the current system is derived. The purpose of this paper is to solve the particularity of medical malpractice resolution system, to analyze the limitation of current medical accident dispute resolution system, and to put forward some suggestions for perfection. According to the three methods of resolving medical malpractice dispute, it is divided into three parts. Each part begins with the definition of the corresponding medical accident dispute resolution method, analyzes its characteristics, and analyzes its limitations. As a result, the author respectively formed the effectiveness of the settlement agreement, allowed medical consultants to participate in the settlement, set up a third-party mediation system, legislated to enhance the patient's ability to provide evidence, stipulated the burden of medical record loss, and stipulated the burden of proof of causality. This article comprehensively analyzes the related problems of medical accident dispute resolution system, especially discusses the provisions and deficiencies of Chinese law on this issue. It is hoped that it will arouse further attention and probe into this problem in the field of practice and theory so as to perfect the dispute resolution system of medical malpractice in our country and make the dispute of medical accident be resolved properly and effectively.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.16
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘烟芳;;浅析我国医疗事故举证责任倒置制度[J];法制与社会;2008年21期
2 韩亚男;万里涛;娄继权;;医疗纠纷处理模式及干预途径[J];解放军医院管理杂志;2009年01期
3 李青霞;;浅析民事执行和解制度[J];学理论;2011年29期
4 曾清;崔航;;医患纠纷第三方解决机制成立的探讨[J];中共乐山市委党校学报;2010年01期
5 佟占军;孙雪芝;;试论抽象和具体民事法律关系[J];首都师范大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
6 张s,
本文编号:1674685
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1674685.html