当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

食品安全公共警告的违法判断标准

发布时间:2018-04-02 13:13

  本文选题:食品安全公共警告 切入点:食品安全风险警示 出处:《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:公共警告是一种由行政机关向社会公众发布信息提示风险的行政管理活动。在食品安全领域,行政机关通过及时公布食品安全公共警告,能有效提高自身对风险的管理效率和社会公众对风险的规避能力。然而,一旦行政机关在食品安全公共警告中将风险源指向特定的食品,该食品的生产经营者作为被公布方往往会受到不利影响,尤其是一则违法的食品安全公共警告,更会导致被公布方的合法权益受到损害。若想要通过行政救济的方式保护被公布方的合法权利,面临的首要问题,就是如何判断行政机关基于对不确定风险作出预测而公布的食品安全公共警告是否违法。立法上关于食品安全公共警告违法判断标准的规定可以从四个方面进行解读:行政机关有权公布、内容准确客观、适用依据合法和符合法定程序。食品安全公共警告是针对不确定风险作出的信息发布行为,反思发现,在不确定风险的影响下,不能仅以立法上规定的内容不准确不客观和不符合法定程序就认为食品安全公共警告违法。围绕着不确定风险这一特征,判断食品安全公共警告的信息内容是否违法,关键在于其内容是否以合理的风险预测结果为基础,判断食品安全公共警告的公布程序是否违法,关键在于其对于风险的预测和公布是否符合法定程序和正当程序的要求。最后,本文以立法上规定的主体标准和依据标准,结合修正后的内容标准和程序标准,得出关于食品安全公共警告违法判断标准的最终结论。
[Abstract]:Public warning is an administrative activity in which the administrative organs issue information to the public to prompt the risks.In the field of food safety, administrative organs can effectively improve their efficiency of risk management and the ability of the public to evade risks by issuing public warnings on food safety in a timely manner.However, once the agency points the source of risk to a particular food in a public warning on food safety, the producers and operators of the food are often adversely affected, especially by an illegal public warning on food safety.It will also lead to damage to the legitimate rights and interests of the publicised party.If we want to protect the legitimate rights of the published party through administrative relief, the most important problem is how to judge whether the public warning on food safety published by the administrative organ based on the prediction of uncertain risk is illegal.The provisions of legislation on the judgment standard of food safety public warning violation can be interpreted from four aspects: the administrative organ has the power to publish, the content is accurate and objective, the applicable basis is legal and conforms to the legal procedure.Public warning of food safety is an act of publishing information in response to uncertain risks. The reflection found that under the influence of uncertain risks,Food safety public warning should not be regarded as illegal merely on the basis of imprecise and objective content stipulated in legislation and inconsistent with legal procedures.The key to judge whether the information content of food safety public warning is illegal is to judge whether the publication procedure of food safety public warning is illegal on the basis of reasonable risk forecast result.The key is whether the risk prediction and disclosure meet the requirements of due process and due process.Finally, based on the subject standard and basis standard stipulated in legislation, combined with the revised content standard and procedure standard, this paper draws the final conclusion about the judgment standard of food safety public warning violation.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.16

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 施立栋;;论行政机关公布违法事实行为的法律性质[J];行政法论丛;2014年00期

2 刘慧慧;;公共警告的功能性分析与控制[J];公法研究;2014年01期

3 齐虹丽;唐建权;;食品安全风险评估中“专家理性二重性”探析[J];昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版);2014年04期

4 郭庆珠;;风险规制与司法救济:从行政预测决定到风险警示[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2014年03期

5 章志远;鲍燕娇;;作为声誉罚的行政违法事实公布[J];行政法学研究;2014年01期

6 金自宁;;风险行政法研究的前提问题[J];华东政法大学学报;2014年01期

7 金自宁;;风险规制与行政法治[J];法制与社会发展;2012年04期

8 章志远;鲍燕娇;朱湘宁;;作为公共警告的行政违法事实公布[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2012年02期

9 杜仪方;;行政赔偿中的“违法”概念辨析[J];当代法学;2012年03期

10 杨小敏;;我国食品安全风险评估模式之改革[J];浙江学刊;2012年02期



本文编号:1700542

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1700542.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户9291c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com