当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

我国公共企事业单位信息公开法律问题研究

发布时间:2018-04-02 15:14

  本文选题:公共企事业单位 切入点:信息公开 出处:《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:现代社会飞速发展,政府的体量逐渐增大,职权越发细密,所掌握的政府信息也逐渐增多。作为承接了部分政府公共服务职能公共企事业单位,同样掌握着大量信息。这些信息关涉着公共利益的实现,同政府信息一样实行公开,服务公众就成为一种必然。我国《政府信息公开条例》第37条中规定了公共企事业单位是信息公开的法定义务主体,但条文过于概括,没有对公共企事业单位信息公开具体的主体资格,信息范围,公开方式,申请人的救济途径等问题做出细密的规定。导致法条难以适用,指导性,操作性不强。文章从我国立法关于公共企事业单位的定义切入,通过归纳公共企业和事业单位的共性和特性,对二者的内涵和外延做出了详细的界定,通过对公共企事业单位的公益性,垄断性和应受规制性的一一介绍与分析,概括了发展公共利益的目的和意义,并指出政府职权社会化和保障公众知情权是公共企事业单位信息公开的理论出发点。本文针对目前我国公共企事业单位信息公开所面临的主体不明确,范围不清晰,公开方式不具体以及救济途径不畅通等问题,结合典型案例,提出了自己的建议和设想。提出了应该具体化“人民利益密切相关”的涵义,作为判别义务主体的标准;明确应当公开的信息内容分类,细化公开豁免事项的来明确信息公开的范围和边界。确立网络公开主要渠道的地位,大力发展互联网+的信息公开模式,提高信息公开的效率,节约成本。在针对信息公开救济途径不畅的情况,介绍了英日等国家的相关立法和实践成果与经验,提出了效仿他国,探索设立中立的信息公开专门机关来实现对相关信息公开的咨询,引导,监管和救济,提高信息公开的效率,保障路径的合法和独立,并对增设机构的合理性做了讨论,希望为此办法的实现寻找合理的依据。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of modern society, the amount of government has gradually increased, the power of government has become more and more detailed, and the government information has been gradually increased.As a part of the government to undertake public service functions of public enterprises and institutions, also holds a large amount of information.These information is related to the realization of public interest.Article 37 of our country's regulations on the publicity of Government Information stipulates that public enterprises and institutions are the subject of legal obligations for information disclosure, but the provisions are too general, and there is no specific subject qualification and scope of information disclosure for public enterprises and institutions.The public way, the applicant's remedy way and so on the question makes the detailed stipulation.As a result, the law is difficult to apply, instructive, and not operational.The article begins with the definition of public enterprises and institutions in our country, through summing up the commonalities and characteristics of public enterprises and institutions, defines the connotation and extension of the two in detail, and through the public welfare of public enterprises and institutions,The introduction and analysis of monopoly and regulation generalize the purpose and significance of developing public interest and point out that the socialization of government authority and the protection of public right to know are the theoretical starting point for public enterprises and institutions to open information.In view of the problems that the main body, the scope, the way of disclosure and the ways of relief are not clear, the author puts forward his own suggestions and ideas in the light of typical cases in the light of the problems faced by the public enterprises and institutions in our country at present.This paper puts forward that the meaning of "the people's interests are closely related" should be concretized as the criterion of judging the subject of obligation, and that the classification of information content should be made public, and that the scope and boundary of information disclosure should be clarified.It is necessary to establish the status of the main channels of network openness, to develop the mode of information disclosure on the Internet, to improve the efficiency of information disclosure and to save costs.In view of the lack of relief channels for information disclosure, this paper introduces the relevant legislative and practical achievements and experiences of Britain and Japan, and proposes to follow the example of other countries and explore the establishment of a neutral specialized agency for information disclosure to carry out consultation on relevant information disclosure.Guide, supervise and relief, improve the efficiency of information disclosure, guarantee the legitimacy and independence of the path, and discuss the rationality of the establishment of the organization, hoping to find a reasonable basis for the realization of this method.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 秦小建;;政府信息公开的宪法逻辑[J];中国法学;2016年03期

2 王天华;;行政法上的不确定法律概念[J];中国法学;2016年03期

3 周汉华;;打造升级版政务公开制度——论《政府信息公开条例》修改的基本定位[J];行政法学研究;2016年03期

4 程琥;;《政府信息公开条例》的修改[J];国家检察官学院学报;2016年03期

5 肖金明;;法治中国建设从宪法出发[J];法学论坛;2016年03期

6 汤磊;;2014—2015年的中国法治政府建设[J];行政法学研究;2016年02期

7 孟鸿志;张_g;;政府信息公开主体的重构——以“三张清单”制度为路径[J];行政法学研究;2016年01期

8 肖卫兵;;我国政府信息公开日志的实证分析[J];政法论坛;2015年06期

9 肖卫兵;;论政府信息公开申请权滥用行为规制[J];当代法学;2015年05期

10 肖卫兵;;咨询类政府信息公开申请探析[J];法学论坛;2015年05期



本文编号:1700951

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1700951.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c4364***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com