个人信息保护:中国与欧盟删除权异同论

发布时间：2018-04-17 02:11

本文选题：被遗忘权 + 删除权　；参考：《新闻记者》2017年08期

【摘要】：本刊2016年12期发表李兵、展江《美国欧盟对网络空间"被遗忘权"的不同态度》,结尾提到:"我国《网络安全法》所确定的‘删除权’的内涵与欧美各自对‘被遗忘权’的理解和实施存在怎样的同异,则是另一个比较法研究的话题。"本文力图回答这个话题。文章从中欧网络删除权比较研究入手,指出《网络安全法》规定的"删除权"绝非对欧盟《一般数据保护条例》中"删除权"的"引入",而是基于中国实际国情和"秩序观"视野下的制度创新,两者只是"貌合",却存在价值观念上的"神离"。并探寻造成这种差异背后的根本原因,就"删除权"在我国个人信息保护领域的实施、发展和保障提出设想与建议。
[Abstract]:This magazine published Li Bing in the 12th issue of 2016,Zhanjiang's different attitudes towards the "right to be forgotten" in cyberspace are pointed out at the end of the article: "what is the difference between the connotation of the 'right of deletion' as defined in our country's cybersecurity law and the respective understanding and implementation of the right to be forgotten in Europe and the United States?"Is another topic of comparative law research. "This paper tries to answer this topic.This paper starts with the comparative study of the right to delete the network in China and Europe.It is pointed out that the "right of deletion" stipulated in the "Network Security Law" is not the "introduction" of the "right of deletion" in the EU's "General data Protection regulations", but is based on the institutional innovation from the perspective of China's actual national conditions and "view of order".The two are only "appearance", but there is a value of "God apart".This paper also explores the fundamental reasons behind this difference, and puts forward some ideas and suggestions on the implementation, development and protection of the "right to delete" in the field of personal information protection in China.
【作者单位】：中央人民广播电台;中国人民大学新闻学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“新媒体时代个人信息保护问题研究”(14BXW036)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.16;D95;DD912.1

【相似文献】