台儿庄古城法律保护研究
发布时间:2018-04-26 10:06
本文选题:台儿庄古城 + 法律保护 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:台儿庄位于山东省南部的枣庄市,作为一个包含台儿庄古城、京杭大运河台儿庄区段以及二战遗址的历史文化名城,在由“卖资源”向“卖文化”、“卖创意”转型的过程中,进一步加强古城的法律保护势在必行。在台儿庄古城的保护上,虽然,枣庄市人大常委会于2013年11月出台了《山东省台儿庄古城保护管理条例》,但在相关配套规定及可操作性方面仍旧还不很完善。并且,在当前公众对文化遗产保护意识还相对薄弱的情况下,通过法律保护,既能为古城规划实施和规范管理提供法律依据和保障,也能避免因过度商业化开发给文化遗产带来的人为破坏,对于创新文化遗产保护模式、探索文化产业发展道路,具有重要的现实意义。 本文从台儿庄古城法律保护入手,通过个案分析法、比较法及综合分析法等多种研究方法,结合社会学、历史学、经济学及法学理论等多个角度对古城法律保护的必要性进行分析,发现目前台儿庄古城法律保护方面存在法律原则缺乏明确性,可操作性差,保护资金来源渠道缺乏法定性及公众参与程度低且无法律依据等不足。并与日本、法国、英国、意大利等国家古城法律保护加以比较,学习与借鉴他们法律保护方面的成功经验。在法律制度建设方面:明确古城法律保护原则及保护对象,将非物质文化传统纳入古城保护范围;完善责任追究机制,使对于古城破坏行为的惩罚具体化、量刑准确化。在古城保护行政管理体制方面:在保留目前双层管理体制的前提下,学习意大利“文物监管人”制度,以克服管理程序繁琐所带来的行政效率低下的弊端。在保护规划方面:尽力做到事前规划,使规划真正发挥指导作用,而非流于形式。在资金投入方面:借鉴日本、英国、意大利等国的做法,将投入资金比例法定化,从政府拨款、公众募捐、文化产业等多种渠道为古城保护筹集资金。在公众参与方面:疏通公众参与渠道,充分发挥古城保护民间组织力量,使古城保护成为一种人民自觉行为。 笔者希望通过本文的研究,可以引起国内各地方对于古城法律保护的关注,特别是为台儿庄古城今后发展中法律保护提供具体、可行性建议。
[Abstract]:Taierzhuang is located in Zaozhuang City in the south of Shandong Province. As a famous historical and cultural city including the ancient city of Taierzhuang, the section of the Grand Canal in Beijing and Hangzhou and the ruins of World War II, it is in the process of transforming from "selling resources" to "selling culture" and "selling creativity". It is imperative to further strengthen the legal protection of the ancient city. In the protection of the ancient city of Taierzhuang, although the standing Committee of the people's Congress of Zaozhuang City promulgated the regulations on Protection and Management of the Ancient City of Taierzhuang in Shandong Province in November 2013, the relevant supporting regulations and operational aspects are still not perfect. Moreover, under the condition that the public's awareness of cultural heritage protection is relatively weak, legal protection can not only provide the legal basis and guarantee for the planning and implementation of the ancient city, but also for the normative management of the ancient city. It can also avoid the artificial destruction of cultural heritage caused by excessive commercial development, which is of great practical significance for innovating the mode of cultural heritage protection and exploring the way of cultural industry development. This article starts with the legal protection of Taierzhuang ancient city, through case analysis, comparative law and comprehensive analysis and other research methods, combined with sociology, history, The necessity of legal protection in ancient city is analyzed from economics and legal theory. It is found that the legal principle of legal protection in Taierzhuang is lack of clarity and operability is poor. Lack of legal qualification and lack of public participation and lack of legal basis to protect the sources of funds. And compared with Japan, France, Britain, Italy and other countries in the legal protection of ancient cities, learn and learn from their successful experience in legal protection. In the aspect of legal system construction: make clear the legal protection principle and object of ancient city, bring the immaterial cultural tradition into the scope of ancient city protection, perfect the responsibility investigation mechanism, make the punishment of the destruction of ancient city concrete and the sentencing accurate. In the aspect of ancient city protection administration system: on the premise of retaining the current two-tier management system, we should study the Italian "cultural relic supervisor" system in order to overcome the drawback of low administrative efficiency caused by cumbersome management procedures. In the aspect of protection planning: try to plan beforehand so that it can play a guiding role rather than a mere formality. In terms of capital investment: learn from the practices of Japan, Britain, Italy and other countries, the proportion of investment will be legalized, from government funds, public donations, cultural industry and other channels to raise funds for the protection of ancient cities. In the aspect of public participation: dredge the channels of public participation, give full play to the power of protecting the civil organizations in ancient cities, and make the protection of ancient cities become a kind of conscious behavior of the people. The author hopes that through the study of this article, it can arouse the attention of all the places in China to the legal protection of the ancient city, especially to provide concrete and feasible suggestions for the legal protection in the future development of the ancient city of Taierzhuang.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.16
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李冈原;;意大利历史文化遗产保护刍议——以威尼斯为个案[J];浙江传媒学院学报;2007年04期
2 王林;中外历史文化遗产保护制度比较[J];城市规划;2000年08期
3 张松;;历史文化名城保护制度建设再议[J];城市规划;2011年01期
4 邵甬,阮仪三;关于历史文化遗产保护的法制建设——法国历史文化遗产保护制度发展的启示[J];城市规划汇刊;2002年03期
5 阮仪三,张艳华;上海城市遗产保护观念的发展及对中国名城保护的思考[J];城市规划学刊;2005年01期
6 赵中枢;英国古城保护的立法过程、保护内容及其保护方式[J];北京规划建设;1999年02期
7 顾晓伟;阮仪三;王建波;李文墨;杨国栋;;台儿庄古城区规划设计与实施经验探讨[J];规划师;2011年S1期
8 贾鸿雁;关于历史文化名城老城区旅游发展的思考——以扬州为例[J];桂林旅游高等专科学校学报;2004年03期
9 范忠信;胡荣明;;历史文化名城法律保护的立法任务[J];法治研究;2012年11期
10 唐海清;;论美国“文化遗产犯罪量刑准则”及其对我国的启示[J];时代法学;2010年02期
,本文编号:1805569
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1805569.html