修复生态环境责任的实证解析

发布时间：2018-04-27 04:25

本文选题：民事责任 + 生态环境损害　；参考：《法学研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：修复生态环境责任在实践中面临两大难题:一是生态环境损害难以认定;二是修复的裁判要求难以达到妥当程度。对此,需结合法律规范和司法判决,对"生态环境损害"和"修复"进行解析。对生态环境损害的认识应在两方面展开:一是损害是生态环境的物理、化学、生物特性的不利改变以及提供生态系统服务能力的破坏、损伤;二是损害应可评估。基于修复范围、标准、方式、方案的限定和筛选,裁判中的修复要求应作出尽可能精确的妥当表达。"修复生态环境"与民法中的"恢复原状"存在很大差异,在救济对象、标准、方式等方面两者无法相提并论。民法总则未将"修复生态环境"纳入民事责任承担方式,是科学、妥当的安排。
[Abstract]:In practice, the responsibility of repairing the ecological environment is faced with two major difficulties: one is that the damage to the ecological environment is difficult to determine; the other is that the judicial requirements of the restoration are difficult to reach the appropriate level. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the damage to the ecological environment and the restoration of the ecological environment in combination with the legal norms and judicial decisions. The understanding of ecological environmental damage should be carried out in two aspects: one is the adverse change of the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the ecological environment and the damage of the ability to provide ecosystem services, the other is that the damage should be evaluated. "based on the scope, criteria, methods, limitations and selection of the scheme, the repair requirements in the referee shall be expressed as accurately and appropriately as possible." There is a great difference between the restoration of ecological environment and the restoration of the original state in the civil law, which can not be compared in terms of relief objects, standards, ways and so on. It is a scientific and proper arrangement that the general principles of civil law do not include the restoration of ecological environment in the way of civil liability.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【分类号】：D922.68

【相似文献】