公共场所卫生行政处罚裁量研究

发布时间：2018-04-30 01:12

本文选题：行政处罚 + 裁量　；参考：《上海交通大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：裁量出现在行政法的各个角落。行政处罚中裁量权的使用有其合理性和必要性，，但也不可否认，它是一把双刃剑。它弥补了由于法律滞后、执行僵化、社会多变造成法律空白所带来的漏洞，提高了行政效率，提升了行政效果，但同时它也造成了行政权力被滥用的不良现象。正是因为行政裁量权被不合理的运用的情景大量存在，裁量权控制显得尤为重要。本文选择“无健康证”这一案由，对公共场所卫生行政处罚的具体情况进行分析，论述公共场所卫生行政处罚中该如何控制裁量权的使用。阐明卫生行政部门可以通过制定行政处罚裁量原则、确立具体案由裁量基准、要求裁量过程说明理由、建立案卷评审制度、公示裁量标准、司法审查等方法规范裁量权的使用，以避免执法随意性，防止权力滥用，保障个案公正，维护行政相对人的利益。
[Abstract]:Discretion appears in every corner of administrative law. The use of discretion in administrative punishment has its rationality and necessity, but it is undeniable that it is a double-edged sword. It makes up for the loopholes caused by the legal blank caused by the lag of the law, the rigidity of the execution and the changing society, and improves the administrative efficiency and the administrative effect, but at the same time, it also causes the bad phenomenon of the abuse of the administrative power. It is because of the situation that the administrative discretion is used irrationally, the discretion control is particularly important. This article chooses the case of "no health certificate" to analyze the specific situation of public health administrative punishment, and discusses how to control the use of discretion in public health administrative punishment. It is expounded that the administrative department of health can regulate the use of the discretion by formulating the principle of administrative penalty discretion, establishing a specific case discretion standard, requiring the discretion process to explain the reasons, establishing a case file review system, publicizing the discretion standard, and judicial review, etc. In order to avoid arbitrary law enforcement, to prevent abuse of power, to protect the fairness of the case, and to safeguard the interests of the administrative counterpart.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.16

【参考文献】