冲突规则的重构——以美国《第三次冲突法重述》为视角

发布时间：2018-04-30 16:26

本文选题：《第三次冲突法重述》 + 冲突法革命　；参考：《政法论坛》2017年04期

【摘要】：基于《第二次冲突法重述》存在的缺陷、对冲突法革命进行反思与总结之需及国际因素的深化等原因,美国法学会已启动的《第三次冲突法重述》的编纂工作无疑是必要的,其也代表了美国冲突法的新发展。在理论基础方面,为实现法律适用的确定性目标,《第三次冲突法重述》应摒弃《第二次冲突法重述》的折中主义,在以法律关系地域化方法为理论基础的前提下,适当吸纳现代选法理论。在具体规则方面,应反思《第二次冲突法重述》第6条规定的开放式冲突规则,改进第145条与第188条规定的连结点集群式冲突规则,以及软化以第233条为代表的硬性冲突规则。美国冲突法的新发展表明,选法理论的多元化成为当代冲突法发展中的一种客观现象,当今冲突法仍然需要在确定性与个案正义之间寻求适当平衡,司法本地化的狭隘思维应被摒弃。
[Abstract]:Based on the defects of the second conflict Law restatement, the need for reflection and summary of the conflict Law Revolution and the deepening of international factors, the compilation of the third conflict Law restatement, which has been initiated by the American Society of Law, is undoubtedly necessary. It also represents the new development of American conflict law. On the theoretical basis, in order to realize the definite goal of the application of the law, the restatement of the third conflict Law should abandon the eclecticism of the second conflict Law, and take the method of regionalization of the legal relationship as the theoretical basis. Appropriate absorption of modern selection theory. In terms of specific rules, we should reflect on the open conflict rules stipulated in Article 6 of the second conflict of conflict Law, improve the cluster conflict rule in articles 145 and 188, and soften the hard conflict rule represented by Article 233. The new development of American conflict law shows that the diversification of the theory of choice of law has become an objective phenomenon in the development of contemporary conflict law. Nowadays, the conflict law still needs to seek a proper balance between certainty and case justice. The narrow thinking of judicial localization should be abandoned.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学;
【基金】：2014年度国家社科基金重大项目“中国涉外民事关系法体系完善研究”(项目批准号:14ZDC032)阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D971.2;DD912.1

【相似文献】