论我国教育督学制度的立法及其完善

发布时间：2018-05-12 20:35

本文选题：教育督导 + 督学　；参考：《江西师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：国务院颁布的《教育督导条例》于2012年10月1日正式施行，虽然国家一直都很重视我国教育督学制度的构建，但我国督学制度的立法还是有诸多不完善之处，这导致现实中很多地区的督学被形式化，没有很好的发挥督学的作用。本文主要从立法的角度分析我国教育督学制度的现状及存在的问题，，进而对完善我国教育督学立法提出建议。第一部分对督学的概念进行界定。然后通过研究国内外教育督学制度的溯源，了解督学制度并不是一成不变的，而是随着人类社会历史的发展不断演变的。通过对比研究，各国的督学制度差异很大。而导致这些差异的因素有多种：民族文化传统以及各国的政治体制等等。第二部分对我国教育督学制度的立法现状进行分析。归纳关于教育督学的法律条款，在此基础上，分析存在的问题。归纳出督学立法理念、督学任用制度、督学权责以及督学回避制度等等在立法上的不足之处。第三部分通过对英、法、日各国教育督学制度的对比研究，探索外国的教育督学制度立法对我国教育督学制度立法的借鉴意义。第四部分针对我国教育督学制度在立法方面存在的问题,对完善我国教育督学制度的立法提出一些建议。
[Abstract]:The regulations on Education Supervision promulgated by the State Council came into effect on October 1, 2012. Although the state has always attached great importance to the construction of our country's education supervision system, there are still many imperfections in the legislation of our country's supervision system. This led to the reality of many areas of supervision has been formalized, did not play a good role in supervision. This paper mainly analyzes the present situation and existing problems of our country's educational supervision system from the angle of legislation, and then puts forward some suggestions for perfecting our country's education supervision system. The first part defines the concept of superintendent. Then, by studying the origin of the educational supervision system at home and abroad, we can understand that the supervision system is not invariable, but evolving with the development of human history. Through the comparative study, the supervision system of each country is very different. These differences are caused by a variety of factors: national cultural traditions and national political systems and so on. The second part analyzes the current situation of education supervision system in China. On the basis of summarizing the legal provisions of educational supervision, this paper analyzes the existing problems. This paper sums up the legislative ideas, the appointment system, the power and responsibility of the superintendent and the avoidance system of the superintendent, and so on. The third part explores the significance of the foreign legislation of the educational supervision system to the legislation of our country's education supervision system through the comparative study of the educational supervision system in Britain, France and Japan. In the fourth part, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the legislation of education supervision system in view of the problems existing in the legislation of our country's educational supervision system.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.16

【参考文献】