论警察禁闭制度

发布时间：2018-05-15 13:50

本文选题：警察 + 禁闭　；参考：《清华法学》2017年05期

【摘要】：《人民警察法》第48条第3款中关于在必要时对违反纪律的警察采取禁闭措施的规定是我国法律的特殊制度安排,系警察组织管理下游——法律责任中的重要内容。尽管如此,以往围绕警察禁闭制度所做的专门性研究极其有限,这很大程度源于"禁闭"处在"法律责任"的章节之下过于微观,且缺少域外制度的参考。然而,警察个体的人身自由因禁闭措施而遭受限制,倘若在法律上无法澄清"违反纪律"、"必要时"等概念,势必引发制度本身的合法性危机。回顾六十年来"禁闭"规范的变迁,虽然具体化的尝试从未停止,但诸多规定不够明确,进而导致"禁闭"实践的混乱。因此,我国警察禁闭制度亟待系统性研究,在"禁闭"的历史中考察其根源,把握其理论张力,厘清违反纪律、禁闭措施与法律责任之间的微妙关系,进而设计包括禁闭措施的适用条件、决定主体和程序、实施机关、期限以及救济方式在内的一系列制度细节,实现制度实施的法制化与实践运作的规范化,最终在(行政)法学理论上形塑中国话语。
[Abstract]:Article 48, paragraph 3, of the people's Police Law, which provides for the taking of confinement measures against police officers who violate discipline when necessary, is a special institutional arrangement of Chinese law, which is an important part of the downstream legal responsibility of police organizations. However, the previous specialized research on the police confinement system is extremely limited, which to a large extent stems from the fact that the "confinement" is too microscopic under the chapter of "legal responsibility" and lacks the reference of the extraterritorial system. However, the personal freedom of individual police officers is restricted by the confinement measures. If the concepts of "violating discipline" and "if necessary" cannot be clarified in law, it will inevitably lead to a crisis of legality of the system itself. Looking back on the changes of the "confinement" norm in the past 60 years, although the concrete attempt has never stopped, many regulations are not clear enough, which leads to the confusion of the practice of "confinement". Therefore, it is urgent to study the system of police confinement in our country. In the history of "confinement", we should investigate its origin, grasp its theoretical tension, and clarify the subtle relationship between disciplinary violations, measures of confinement and legal responsibility. Then it designs a series of system details, including the applicable conditions of the confinement measures, the determination of the subject and procedure, the implementing organ, the time limit and the relief method, so as to realize the legalization of the system implementation and the standardization of the practical operation. Finally, in the (administrative) legal theory shape the Chinese discourse.
【作者单位】：中国人民公安大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.14

【相似文献】