我国官员信息公开范围研究

发布时间：2018-05-18 00:38

本文选题：官员 + 信息公开　；参考：《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着对官员信息规制的不断完善、政府信息公开的发展，社会上对于官员信息公开的呼声也愈发高涨。与此相对，我国有关官员信息公的范围的规定尚未完善，，实践中也出现了令出不行、拒绝公开的情况。在这一背景下，本文对官员信息的公开范围进行梳理和重新建构，并且针对实践中出现的问题提出相关解决方案。全文共分为五部分：第一部分是对文章的缘起和背景的简单概述。我国官员信息公开正在逐步发展，实践中出现了诸多问题，因此对官员信息公开范围的研究具有实践意义。我国学术、立法与实践也为本文的研究提供了基础。第二部分主要讨论了官员信息公开范围如何确定。官员信息进行公开的正当性基础是公共利益，而不公开与有限公开主要缘于隐私权保护和效率原则。官员信息公开范围的内容包括个人基本信息、财产信息、个人重大事项和职务信息四大方面。第三部分是我国官员信息公开范围的实证分析。我国针对官员信息公开的实践与政府信息公开制度、任前公示制度、财产公开制度相联系，立法较为分散。在实践中出现了缺乏整体性规定、公开范围不完整、公开方式限制公开范围扩大、政府掌握信息过于宽泛等问题。第四部分是文章的总结，即对官员信息公开范围的具体建构。官员信息公开范围的确定应当遵循利益平衡原则、比例原则、国家安全原则、同意原则与公共场所原则四大原则进行。官员信息公开的四类信息需要根据实践情况设立不同的公开方式。第五部分是文章的结语。这部分重申了文章主题的研究意义，并且对官员信息公开范围的合理确立进行了梳理。
[Abstract]:With the continuous improvement of the regulation of official information and the development of government information disclosure, the voice of official information disclosure has become increasingly popular in society. In contrast, the scope of official information in our country has not been improved, and in practice, there is a situation that the official can not be ordered and refuses to be made public. Under this background, this paper combs and reconstructs the public scope of official information, and puts forward some relevant solutions to the problems in practice. The paper is divided into five parts: the first part is a brief overview of the origin and background of the article. The publicity of official information in our country is developing step by step, and there are many problems in practice, so it is of practical significance to study the scope of official information disclosure. China's academic, legislative and practice also provide a basis for this study. The second part mainly discusses how to determine the scope of official information disclosure. The legitimate basis of official information disclosure is public interest, while non-disclosure and limited disclosure are mainly due to the protection of privacy and the principle of efficiency. The contents of official information disclosure include four aspects: personal basic information, property information, personal important affairs and position information. The third part is the empirical analysis of the scope of official information disclosure. The practice of official information disclosure in our country is connected with the system of government information disclosure, the system of publicity before appointment and the system of property disclosure, and the legislation is relatively scattered. In practice, there are some problems, such as the lack of holistic regulation, the incomplete scope of disclosure, the restriction of the expansion of the scope of disclosure by the way of disclosure, and the wide range of information held by the government. The fourth part is the summary of the article, that is, the specific construction of the scope of official information disclosure. The determination of the scope of official information disclosure should follow the principle of balance of interests, the principle of proportionality, the principle of national security, the principle of consent and the principle of public places. Four kinds of information of official information disclosure need to set up different ways of disclosure according to practice. The fifth part is the conclusion of the article. This part reiterates the significance of the research on the subject of the article, and combs the reasonable establishment of the scope of official information disclosure.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】