论对被诉行政行为改变的规制

发布时间：2018-05-20 04:27

本文选题：被诉行政行为 + 改变方式　；参考：《南京师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：自1989年《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》(下文简称《行政诉讼法》)颁布实施以来,被诉行政主体在诉讼过程中能否改变被诉行政行为一直是一个颇具争议的话题。学界对这个问题展开过讨论,并形成了“肯定说”、“否定说”和“折中说”等三种不同的观点。截止到目前,理论界对被诉行政行为改变的概念界定还存在分歧,对被诉行政行为改变的性质界定也存在“行政行为说”、“诉讼行为说”和“折中说”等多种不同的主张。理论界对被诉行政行为改变制度的争论并没有影响到其在司法实践中的开展。在司法实践中,被告改变被诉行政行为十分常见。可以说,当被诉行政主体在认识到自己行为的违法或不当的情形下,主动改变被诉行政行为,有利于缓解原、被告双方的对立情绪,能够及时的补救对相对人造成的损失,助于最终实现案结事了。但是,由于对被诉行政主体行为改变行为规制的缺失,不受约束的被诉行政主体改变行为带来负面结果也逐渐显现出来。由此,如何更好的规制被诉行政行为的改变成为另一个新的争议焦点。为了更好的发挥被诉行政行为改变制度的积极效用,解决其在司法实践中的实施产生的负面问题,必须对被诉行政行为改变制度进行更加深入的理论分析,实现对被告改变被诉行政行为的有效规制,最终达到趋利避害的结果。
[Abstract]:Since the promulgation and implementation of the Administrative Litigation Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Administrative Litigation Law) in 1989, it has been a controversial topic whether the subject of the accused administration can change the administrative act of the accused in the process of litigation. Scholars have discussed this issue and formed three different views: affirmative theory, negative theory and compromise theory. Up to now, there are still differences in the definition of the concept of the change of the administrative behavior of the accused in the theoretical circle, and there are many different opinions on the nature of the change of the administrative act of the accused, such as "the theory of administrative act", "theory of litigation act" and "eclectic theory". The debate on the system of change of administrative behavior has not affected its development in judicial practice. In judicial practice, it is very common for the defendant to change the administrative behavior of the accused. It can be said that when the accused administrative subject, in recognition of the illegal or improper situation of his own conduct, takes the initiative to change the administrative act being sued, it is conducive to alleviating the antagonistic feelings between the two sides of the accused, and can promptly remedy the losses caused to the relative person. It helped to bring the case to a close. However, due to the lack of regulation on the behavior change of the accused administrative subject, the unconstrained change of the administrative subject brings negative results. Therefore, how to better regulate the change of administrative behavior becomes another new focus of controversy. In order to give full play to the positive effect of the system of the change of the accused administrative behavior and to solve the negative problems arising from its implementation in the judicial practice, it is necessary to carry out a deeper theoretical analysis of the system of the change of the administrative act of the accused. To realize the effective regulation of the defendant to change the administrative behavior of the accused, and finally to achieve the result of seeking advantages and avoiding harm.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】