人文关怀视角下我国代孕行为的法律规制

发布时间：2018-05-20 04:32

本文选题：代孕行为 + 法律规制　；参考：《广东财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：代孕作为人类辅助生殖技术之一,可以解决部分不孕不育问题,实现不孕夫妇生儿育女的愿望。但由于代孕技术会对传统公序良俗原则造成不利影响,我国对其采取了全面禁止的态度。然而在司法实践中,代孕行为却禁而不止,主要是因为代孕技术具有巨大的社会需求。这种立法与实践的偏差,导致了代孕市场的混乱以及法律规则上的困难。由于代孕技术是一个十分复杂的人类辅助生育技术手段,涉及诸多的医学名词与技术。文章力图围绕主要的法律问题来进行探讨,因此刻意回避了代孕技术本身的医学复杂性。为此,文章以规制代孕行为为主要写作目的,并以实事求是、科学严谨的态度来回应现实中出现的实际问题。同时,基于中共十七大报告以及近期王利明教授对于“人文关怀”的阐释,我们认为对于代孕行为也应当给予更多的理解与支持,采取有限开放的模式。因此,文章选择在人文关怀的视角下来审视代孕行为的法律规制。本文除引言和后记外,共分为四章。第一章从法律规制的角度,提出了代孕行为的概念和类型,以及对其进行规制的必要性。第二章介绍我国规制代孕行为的法律规定和实践效果的现状及不足。第三章比较国外关于代孕行为的三种法律规制模式,并指出有限开放代孕的合理性。第四章分析代孕行为法律规制模式重构中存在的核心问题,并设想了可行的解决途径。
[Abstract]:Surrogacy, as one of human assisted reproductive technology, can solve some infertility problems and realize the desire of infertile couples to have children. However, surrogacy technology will have a negative impact on the traditional public order and good customs, so our country has taken an all-out ban on it. However, surrogacy is prohibited in judicial practice, mainly because surrogacy has great social demand. The deviation between legislation and practice leads to confusion in surrogacy market and difficulties in legal rules. Surrogate technology is a very complicated means of assisted human fertility, involving many medical terms and techniques. The article tries to discuss the main legal problems, so it avoids the medical complexity of surrogacy. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to regulate surrogacy, and to respond to the practical problems with the attitude of seeking truth from facts and scientific preciseness. At the same time, based on the report of the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and professor Wang Liming's explanation of "humanistic care", we believe that surrogacy should also be understood and supported more and adopt a limited open mode. Therefore, the article chooses to examine the legal regulation of surrogacy from the perspective of humanistic care. In addition to the introduction and postscript, this article is divided into four chapters. The first chapter puts forward the concept and type of surrogacy from the angle of legal regulation and the necessity of regulating it. The second chapter introduces the current situation and deficiency of the regulation of surrogacy in China. The third chapter compares the three modes of legal regulation about surrogacy in foreign countries, and points out the rationality of limited open surrogacy. Chapter four analyzes the core problems in the reconstruction of legal regulation mode of surrogacy, and conceives the feasible ways to solve it.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.16

【参考文献】