权力与权利之间:台湾地区烟害防制法制经验与启示

发布时间：2018-05-29 11:05

本文选题：“烟害防制法” + 烟害防制手段　；参考：《台湾研究集刊》2017年01期

【摘要】：台湾地区烟害防制法制以"烟害防制法"这一专门性立法为核心,辅之以"行政院"配套实施的行政规则及"烟酒税法"等单行立法作为重要补充。烟害防制的手段包括健康福利捐的征收、烟品包装与标示的强制要求、烟品贩卖与广告的限制、特定群类禁止吸烟及特定区域设定禁烟等。这些手段涉及公权力干预社会习惯,引发了关于权力与权利平衡的论争。台湾地区"大法官解释"的基本脉络以"法律保留"作为公权力干预公民基本权利的正当性基础,以"比例原则"作为划定公权力介入公民基本权利疆域的工具,很好地解决了权力与权利之间的平衡问题。这一经验为大陆地区控烟立法过程中解决类似的问题提供了启发。
[Abstract]:The legislative system of tobacco damage control in Taiwan is based on the specialized legislation of the Tobacco Hazard Prevention Law, supplemented by the administrative rules of the Executive Yuan and the separate legislation of the Tobacco and Wine tax Law as an important supplement. Measures to prevent and control tobacco damage include collection of health and welfare donations, mandatory requirements for packaging and labelling of tobacco products, restrictions on tobacco sales and advertising, prohibition of smoking in specific groups and establishment of a ban on smoking in specific areas. These measures involve public power to interfere with social habits and lead to controversy about the balance between power and power. The basic context of the interpretation of the "justices" in Taiwan is that "legal reservation" is the legitimate basis for public power to interfere with citizens' basic rights, and the "principle of proportionality" is used as a tool to delineate the boundaries of public power's intervention in citizens' basic rights. The balance between power and power is well solved. This experience provides inspiration for solving similar problems in the process of tobacco control legislation in mainland China.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“国家治理体系现代化与法治政府建设研究”(14ZDA018) 中国政法大学2015年博士研究生创新实践项目“食品安全行政执法与刑事司法衔接机制实证研究”(2015BSCX05)
【分类号】：D927

【相似文献】