论完善我国行业协会惩戒权的法律规制
本文选题:惩戒权 + 行业协会 ; 参考:《宁波大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:当前我国经济改革的深入开展,市场是经济运行中的重要环节,并且我国将市场经济的改革和发展列为我国经济发展的重要目标。那么就意味着政府进一步削弱其权力对市场限制,使的市场更加灵活的调配资源,自由的运行。政府职能的转型,在市场中位置逐渐转换的过程中,社会组织的地位与日俱增。那么行业协会作为众多企业自治的产物,在维护行业内企业共同利益,管理行业秩序,协调内部关系上都发挥着越来越重要的作用。就目前我国国内市场现状的分析,我国行业协会与国外领先的市场水平还有一些差距。因此,为了促进企业在行业协会管理下的发展,就必须对行业协会的管理制度进行相应的调整和完善。而行业协会的惩戒权作为管理和维护行业内部稳定的保障,也是行业协会管理制度调整的重要环节。但惩戒权作为权力的使用,需要进行法律规制,以求行业协会能够规范正确的使用惩戒权,更好的维护行业秩序和市场秩序。本文运用比较法和理论分析法,借鉴国外先进的关于行业协会的自治权的相关规定,并与我国现阶段的成果进行相应的对比,并且过程中参考国内外学者的研究,结合我国的现状和政策发展方向,对行业协会惩戒权制度的构建提出一些可行性建议。为了论证可行性建议,本文将分为以下四章来进行论述:第一章主要论述行业协会惩戒权的适用及其性质。了解行业协会惩戒权的适用主体、规范客体和内容,并且理清他们之间的关系,有助于加深对行业协会惩戒权理论上的了解。并且分析行业协会惩戒权的性质,从自律性和契约性来阐述惩戒权的本质。第二章主要是对行业协会惩戒权进行法律规制的理论基础进行论述。透过对行业协会惩戒权的两个原则的概述,阐明法律规制的重要性。而且指出行业协会惩戒权的法律规制在实际运用中发挥的作用作为其依据,体现其价值。第三章主要对行业协会惩戒权的现状进行分析。首先找出行业协会惩戒权在我国所面对的几个主要问题,其次透过对我国现状分析以及国外经验分析,了解国内外之间的差距,并为提出可行性建议提供思路。第四章主要是从第三章所提出的问题入手,提出相应的完善建议。从行业协会的主体定位、程序应用到最后的救济制度,分别提出一些可行性建议。
[Abstract]:At present, with the development of economic reform in our country, the market is an important link in the economic operation, and the reform and development of the market economy is regarded as the important target of our country's economic development. That means that the government further weakens its power to restrict the market, making the market more flexible to allocate resources and operate freely. With the transformation of government function, social organization is becoming more and more important in the process of changing position in the market. Then, as the product of many enterprises' autonomy, trade associations play a more and more important role in safeguarding the common interests of enterprises, managing the order of the industry, and coordinating the internal relations. Based on the analysis of the present situation of domestic market in China, there is still some gap between China's trade association and the leading market level of foreign countries. Therefore, in order to promote the development of enterprises under the management of trade associations, the management system of trade associations must be adjusted and perfected accordingly. As the guarantee of management and maintenance of the industry internal stability, the disciplinary power of the trade association is also an important link in the adjustment of the management system of the trade association. However, as the use of power, disciplinary power needs to be regulated by law in order for the trade association to regulate the correct use of disciplinary power and to better maintain the order of the industry and the market. This article uses the comparative method and the theory analysis method, draws lessons from the foreign advanced related stipulation about the profession association's autonomy, and carries on the corresponding contrast with our country's present stage achievement, and in the process consults the domestic and foreign scholar's research. Combined with the current situation and policy development direction of our country, some feasible suggestions on the construction of disciplinary power system of trade association are put forward. In order to prove the feasibility, this paper will be divided into the following four chapters: the first chapter mainly discusses the application and nature of disciplinary power of trade association. Understanding the applicable subject, standardizing the object and content of the disciplinary power of the trade association, and clarifying the relationship between them will help to deepen the theoretical understanding of the disciplinary power of the trade association. It also analyzes the nature of disciplinary power of trade association and expounds the nature of disciplinary power from self-discipline and contract. The second chapter mainly discusses the theoretical basis of the legal regulation of the disciplinary power of trade associations. This paper expounds the importance of legal regulation by summarizing the two principles of disciplinary power of trade associations. It also points out that the legal regulation of disciplinary power of trade association acts as its basis and embodies its value. The third chapter mainly analyzes the current situation of disciplinary power of industry association. First of all, we find out the main problems of the disciplinary power of trade association in our country, and then through the analysis of the present situation of our country and the analysis of foreign experience, we understand the gap between domestic and foreign countries, and provide some ideas for putting forward feasible suggestions. The fourth chapter is mainly from the third chapter raised the question, proposed the corresponding consummation proposal. From the position of the main body of the trade association and the application of the procedure to the final relief system, some feasible suggestions are put forward.
【学位授予单位】:宁波大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.182.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 庞昊;;浅谈行业协会自治与规制的协调[J];才智;2014年05期
2 汪莉;解露露;;行业协会自治权之程序规制[J];行政法学研究;2013年02期
3 司立鹏;;行业协会处罚权的性质探究[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年07期
4 李学兰;;论社会资本视野下的行业协会自治权[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2012年01期
5 鲁篱;楚建会;;行业协会非法律惩罚救济问题研究[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年01期
6 汪莉;;论行业协会自治权的权源及其性质[J];学术界;2010年07期
7 程滔;;从自律走向自治——兼谈律师法对律师协会职责的修改[J];政法论坛;2010年04期
8 鲁篱;;行业协会处罚权的争端解决机制初探[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2009年12期
9 刘志欣;;行业协会惩戒权初探[J];上海企业;2009年10期
10 陈承堂;;社团罚的合法性审思——武汉光谷足球俱乐部退赛事件的法理解读[J];武汉体育学院学报;2009年07期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 陈晓军;互益性法人法律制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2006年
2 鲁篱;行业协会经济自治权研究[D];西南政法大学;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 庞昊;论行业协会惩罚权运行程序的完善[D];河北经贸大学;2015年
2 王雨奇;行业协会自治权的法律问题研究[D];南京工业大学;2014年
3 孟涛;行业自律的惩戒机制研究[D];安徽大学;2012年
4 杨继强;行业组织惩戒权的法律控制[D];南京师范大学;2011年
5 朱玲珑;行业协会惩戒权初探[D];湘潭大学;2011年
6 赵延聪;论行业协会惩戒行为的可诉性[D];中国政法大学;2011年
7 付振华;对中国体育社团处罚的伦理考量[D];湖南师范大学;2009年
8 宁昭;论德国法上的社团罚[D];中国政法大学;2009年
9 沈苗苗;行业协会惩戒权的行政法律规制研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
,本文编号:2000086
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2000086.html