我国区域间行政协定纠纷解决制度研究
发布时间:2018-06-28 23:02
本文选题:区域间行政协定 + 纠纷解决 ; 参考:《江西师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:改革开放以来,我国社会经济取得了全面发展,在行政法领域出现了许多新制度,区域间行政协定即是我国在经济社会发展中为弥补区域间发展差距,减少行政壁垒,实现经济要素跨区域流动而设立的制度,在处理跨区域事物中发挥了重要作用,然而在我国现行法律法规中还没有对区域间行政协定作出专门规定,实践中对于区域间行政协定的法律适用大多套用其他法律法规。学者在该领域的研究主要是在概念的提出,在具体的制度构建方面的研究较为笼统,缺乏深入细致的研究。 本研究以区域间行政协定运行中的重要一环-纠纷解决制度为着手之处,利用文献研究法以及比较研究法,对区域间行政协定纠纷解决制度进行了较为全面系统的探讨。本文主要分为以下几个部分: 第一部分,我国区域间行政协定纠纷解决制度基本理论,首先介绍了区域间行政协定的涵义、特征与意义,分析了区域间行政协定的概念,区域间行政协定产生的现实背景,以及在区域经济一体化中的作用。其次介绍了区域间行政协定纠纷解决制度,着重分析了区域间行政协定纠纷的主要表现形式及责任性质。最后介绍了区域间行政纠纷解决制度的国内外现状,以及该项制度的完善。 第二部分,我国区域间行政协定纠纷行政解决机制,该部分首先介绍了目前我国区域间行政协定纠纷解决制度的现状,,行政解决机制虽然效率高,但程序的不公开也是其明显的缺陷。其次立足于我国现状,提出了对行政解决机制的完善措施。 第三部分,我国区域间行政协定纠纷司法解决机制的构想,司法机制可以很好的弥补行政解决机制的弊端,让公正得以看得见的方式实现,在这方面欧美等国家已经有许多成功的经验可以借鉴,从目前的趋势看,行政机关之间的纠纷通过司法途径解决已是大势所趋。在具体的制度设计方面主要从主管法院、受理条件、起诉主体等方面进行构建。 第四部分,我国区域间行政协定纠纷仲裁解决机制的构想,该部分主要介绍了美国在处理州际协定纠纷方面的做法,以仲裁方式解决行政机关之间的纠纷具有简捷高效等优势,是对行政解决机制和司法解决机制很好的补充,对构建我国行政协定纠纷解决机制有一定的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, our country's social economy has made a comprehensive development, and there are many new systems in the field of administrative law. The interregional administrative agreement is the system set up to make up the gap between regions, reduce administrative barriers and realize the trans regional flow of economic factors in the economic and social development, and play a role in dealing with trans regional things. However, in the current laws and regulations in China, there is no special provision for interregional administrative agreements. In practice, most of the legal applications of interregional administrative agreements apply to other laws and regulations. The research in this field is mainly on the concept, and the research on specific system construction is more general and lack of depth. A careful study.
This study takes the important part of the operation of inter regional administrative agreements as an important part of the dispute settlement system, and makes a comprehensive and systematic discussion on the dispute settlement system of interregional administrative agreements by using the literature research method and comparative study method. This paper is divided into the following parts:
The first part, the basic theory of the dispute settlement system of interregional administrative agreements, first introduces the meaning, characteristics and significance of interregional administrative agreements, analyzes the concept of interregional administrative agreements, the realistic background of the emergence of interregional administrative agreements, and the role in the integration of regional economy. Secondly, it introduces the correction of inter regional administrative agreements. In order to solve the system, the main forms and nature of the disputes between regions are analyzed. Finally, the current situation at home and abroad and the perfection of the system are introduced.
The second part, the administrative settlement mechanism of the interregional administrative agreement in our country, this part first introduces the present situation of the dispute settlement system of the interregional administrative agreement in our country. Although the administrative settlement mechanism is high efficiency, the procedure is also its obvious defect. Secondly, it puts forward the perfection of the administrative settlement mechanism based on the current situation of our country. Measures.
The third part, the conception of judicial settlement mechanism of dispute between regional administrative agreements in our country, the judicial mechanism can make up the malpractice of the administrative settlement mechanism well and let the justice be realized. In this respect, the European and American countries have already had many successful experiences for reference. From the present trend, the disputes among the administrative organs are through. It is a general trend to solve the problem through judicial channels. In terms of the specific system design, it is mainly constructed from the competent court, the conditions of acceptance, the subjects of prosecution and so on.
The fourth part, the concept of arbitration settlement mechanism of interregional administrative agreement disputes in our country, this part mainly introduces the practice of the United States in dealing with interstate agreement disputes, and it is simple and efficient to solve the disputes between administrative organs by arbitration. It is a good supplement to the administrative settlement mechanism and the judicial settlement mechanism, and the construction of our country. The administrative agreement dispute resolution mechanism has certain reference significance.
【学位授予单位】:江西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 董坤;李旺东;;行政协议争议解决机制之构想[J];法制与社会;2013年29期
2 王太高;论机关诉讼——完善我国行政组织法的一个思路[J];河北法学;2005年09期
3 马怀德;行政审判体制重构与司法体制改革[J];国家行政学院学报;2004年01期
4 叶必丰;长三角经济一体化背景下的法制协调[J];上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年06期
5 刘飞;建立独立的行政法院可为实现司法独立之首要步骤——从德国行政法院之独立性谈起[J];行政法学研究;2002年03期
6 何渊;;论行政协议[J];行政法学研究;2006年03期
7 杨临宏;行政协定刍议[J];行政法学研究;1998年01期
8 杨龙;;中国经济区域化发展的行政协调[J];中国人民大学学报;2007年02期
9 梅艳;;行政主体的权限冲突及其解决程序[J];中共浙江省委党校学报;2003年01期
10 杨爱平;;区域合作中的府际契约:概念与分类[J];中国行政管理;2011年06期
本文编号:2079732
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2079732.html