隐性采访法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-01 16:14

本文选题：隐性采访 + 原因　；参考：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：记者要进行新闻报道,最重要的也是第一位的事情是要进行采访。只有进行有效采访,才能更好地进行报道。采访不真实客观,注定报道的新闻也是没有意义的。记者采访时可以采取的手段包括显性采访和隐性采访。隐性采访出现后的100多年来,在提供新闻事实、探索新闻真相、发挥舆论监督方面发挥了重要作用。但是,记者在进行隐性采访时要对被访者隐瞒真实身份和目的,本质上是一种欺骗行为,在社会上引发巨大争议。在英国、美国等国家,隐性采访出现的时间比较早,隐性采访20世纪90年代在我国迎来大发展,随后隐性采访在新闻报道中应用的次数增多,呈现出一种更加兴盛甚至可以说泛滥的态势,其引发的纠纷也随之增多,而现在我国的隐性采访仍然处于无法可依的状态。越来越多的学者主张运用法律的手段对于隐性采访进行规制。因此,本文将对隐性采访进行分析,希望对隐性采访进行法律规制提出一些建议。文章的前言主要介绍本文的写作背景与意义、文献综述以及研究方法。第一部分是隐性采访的概述,主要介绍隐性采访的定义及其基本特征以及国内外发展现状。第二部分是隐性采访存在的原因及出现的问题。首先,从四个方面论述隐性采访存在的原因,一方面,隐性采访是媒体行使采访权以及监督权的体现,另一方面,隐性采访也能够满足受众的知情权;接着论述记者在运用隐性采访中存在的问题,包括两方面内容:一是侵权问题,侵犯如名誉权、隐私权、肖像权等,二是记者在隐性采访中的违法行为,如记者参与到违法犯罪活动中、采用诱导式方式获取新闻、使用非法工具。第三部分为法律规制,为了避免隐性采访损害道德、平衡公共利益与个人利益以及弥补行业自律不足的需要,应该对隐性采访进行法律规制。接下来从三个方面论述隐性采访的原则;再接着论述我国现行法律规制的不足;最后,提出完善法律规制的建议,主要是从以下几个方面:规定隐性采访适用的条件和程序,明确隐性采访的"度",分析隐性采访侵权的责任承担方式,分析隐性采访中获得的证据的效力。
[Abstract]:The reporter wants to carry on the news report, the most important and the first thing is to carry on the interview. Only by conducting an effective interview can the report be carried out better. The interview is not true and objective, and the news that is destined to be reported is meaningless. The means that the reporter can take when interview include explicit interview and recessive interview. Since the emergence of recessive interview, it has played an important role in providing news facts, exploring news truth and giving play to supervision by public opinion. However, it is essentially a deceptive act for reporters to conceal their true identity and purpose from the interviewees when conducting recessive interviews, which leads to great controversy in society. In Britain, the United States and other countries, recessive interviews appeared earlier. Recessive interviews developed greatly in China in the 1990s, and the number of applications of recessive interviews in news reports subsequently increased. Showing a more prosperous or even flooding situation, its disputes are also increasing, but now our country's recessive interview is still in a state that can not be relied on. More and more scholars advocate the use of legal means to regulate hidden interviews. Therefore, this article will analyze the recessive interview, hoping to make some suggestions on the legal regulation of the recessive interview. The preface of this paper mainly introduces the writing background and significance, literature review and research methods. The first part is an overview of recessive interview, mainly introduces the definition of recessive interview and its basic characteristics as well as the development situation at home and abroad. The second part is the hidden interview reasons and problems. First of all, from four aspects to discuss the reasons for the existence of hidden interviews, on the one hand, the hidden interview is the media exercise of the right to interview and the right to supervision, on the other hand, the hidden interview can also meet the audience's right to know; Then it discusses the problems existing in the use of recessive interviews by reporters, including two aspects: first, infringement, such as reputation, privacy, portrait rights, etc.; second, the illegal behavior of reporters in recessive interviews. If journalists participate in illegal and criminal activities, use inductive way to obtain news, use illegal tools. The third part is the legal regulation, in order to avoid the hidden interview damage morality, balance the public interest with the personal interest and make up the need of the industry self-discipline insufficiency, should carry on the legal regulation to the recessive interview. Then discusses the principle of recessive interview from three aspects; then discusses the deficiency of the current legal regulation in our country; finally, puts forward the suggestion to perfect the legal regulation, mainly from the following several aspects: prescribes the condition and the procedure of the application of the implicit interview, This paper clarifies the "degree" of recessive interview, analyzes the way to assume responsibility for the tort of recessive interview, and analyzes the effectiveness of the evidence obtained in recessive interview.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.16

【相似文献】