论我国网络实名制立法之完善

发布时间：2018-07-31 12:34

【摘要】：我国没有专门的法律对网络实名制加以规范,导致网络实名制的制度设计和运行无法可依。司法解释和法条对网络实名制的规定较少。而我国作为世界上网民人数最多的国家,网络实名制的施行需要一整套完整的合乎国情的法规才能得以顺利运行。同时网络实名制运行过程中产生的问题也需要法律加以规定才能在司法实践中运用。我国法律和司法解释只规定了特定人或者特定领域的实名制。因而我国现行的法律中只能为一小部分人或者极少数网络案件提供法律保护。在现实生活中网络虚拟性带来的网络侵权案件时有发生,要更好的发挥网络的优势并营造良好的网络环境就需要从立法角度为实名制的推行提供法律依据。首先,网络实名制的制度设计一方面可采取有限实名制,即网络使用者在浏览网络时真实的个人信息仅在服务商的后台系统显示,在前台系统中依然匿名。另一方面还需要总结实行网络实名制国家的立法和实践经验,从网民的切身利益出发来规范网络主体的行为。同时网络主体与政府通过自律与他律的双重机制来规范网络秩序,营造和谐的网络环境。其次,网络实名制下产生的网络侵权问题需合理分配侵权行为人和网络服务提供商的责任。由侵权行为实施者承担过错责任,网络服务提供商承担有限责任。最后,在网络侵权案件遭遇执行难时,建立民间基金对案件中被侵权人的财产损失进行救济。并通过加强与其他国家的司法合作保障案件得以顺利解决。
[Abstract]:Our country does not have the special law to regulate the network real name system, resulting in the system design and operation of the network real name system can not be followed. The judicial explanation and the law article to the network real name system stipulation is less. However, as the country with the largest number of Internet users in the world, the implementation of the network real name system requires a complete set of laws and regulations in line with the national conditions to run smoothly. At the same time, the problems arising in the operation of network real name system also need to be stipulated by law to be applied in judicial practice. The law and judicial interpretation of our country only stipulate the real name system of specific person or field. Therefore, the current law of our country can only provide legal protection for a small number of people or a very small number of network cases. In real life, the network infringement cases caused by the virtual nature of the network occur from time to time. In order to better play the advantages of the network and create a good network environment, it is necessary to provide the legal basis for the implementation of the real-name system from the legislative point of view. First of all, the system design of network real name system can adopt the limited real name system on the one hand, that is, the real personal information of network users only shows in the background system of the service provider while browsing the network, and it is still anonymous in the front desk system. On the other hand, it is necessary to sum up the legislative and practical experience of the countries carrying out the network real name system, and to standardize the behavior of the network subject from the view of the vital interests of the Internet users. At the same time, the network subject and government regulate the network order and create a harmonious network environment through the dual mechanism of self-discipline and heteronomy. Secondly, the network torts arising under the real name system need to distribute the responsibility of tortfeasors and network service providers reasonably. The tortfeasor bears the fault liability, the network service provider assumes the limited liability. Finally, when the network infringement case is difficult to execute, the private fund is established to remedy the property loss of the infringer in the case. And through strengthening judicial cooperation with other countries to ensure the smooth resolution of cases.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.16

【参考文献】