城管考核机制中的指标体系研究——围绕导向性、设定原则和量化评价的制度文本考察

发布时间：2018-09-05 07:29

【摘要】：面对城管执法实践中所存在的一系列问题,设立并完善科学合理的评价/考核机制,有助于以"结果评价"来督促和改进"工作过程",从而进一步推动城管工作的精细化、严格化和规范化。而在城管考核的机制建设中,首要的,也是更为核心的则是考核指标的设置:在考核指标的导向性上,波伊斯特模型能够较为完整地概括出城管考核的主要方向,并与部分地方的规定存在相通之处;在考核指标的设定原则上,根据对4部城管考核规范的分析和总结,其应当遵循全面性原则、真实性原则、可操作性原则并坚持过程和结果并重;而在考核指标的量化评价上,根据对8部城管考核规范的分析和总结,赋分量化方面应当在考核细目与具体赋分、分数分配和扣分规则等方面做到合理设置,计分量化方面则应在分制、计分公式、单独加减分项等方面做到合理设置。
[Abstract]:In the face of a series of problems existing in the practice of urban management law enforcement, the establishment and improvement of a scientific and reasonable evaluation / assessment mechanism will help to supervise and improve the "working process" with "result evaluation", thus further promoting the refinement of urban management work. Strict and standardized. In the construction of urban management assessment mechanism, the most important and more important is the setting of the assessment index: in the direction of the assessment index, the Boyster model can summarize the main direction of the urban management assessment completely. And there are some similarities with some local regulations; in the setting principle of the assessment index, according to the analysis and summary of the four urban management assessment norms, it should follow the principle of comprehensiveness and authenticity, In the quantitative evaluation of the assessment index, according to the analysis and summary of the eight urban management assessment norms, the quantification of the score should be in the aspects of the examination detail and the specific score. The distribution of points and the rules of deduction should be set reasonably, while the quantification of points should be reasonably set up in the aspects of division system, scoring formula, separate addition and subtraction, and so on.
【作者单位】：东北财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“民生视域下构建城市管理综合执法的多元自我管控机制研究”(15CZZ035) 东北财经大学优秀科研创新人才项目(DUFE2015R10)
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】