论道路交通事故纠纷赔偿双重标准的统一
发布时间：2018-12-29 18:02
【摘要】：我国在人身损害赔偿体系中存在死亡赔偿金的双重标准,在媒体和公众的解读中以“同命不同价”的说法备受质疑,法学界对死亡赔偿金的性质也未达成一致意见。近年来,随着经济社会发展,城乡一体化进程加快,双重赔偿标准的现实基础已经改变。在日趋社会化的道路交通事故赔偿体系中,双重赔偿标准已显示出滞后性,带来一些负面影响。随着户籍制度改革的深入,城乡差别的进一步缩小,有必要立足于道路交通事故的特点,借鉴域外以及我国立法中的经验,建立完善配套机制,在一定地域内逐步统一城乡标准。 文章结构上主要包括五个部分,第一个部分为导论,总结国内外学者对死亡赔偿制度的研究现状,指出本文的写作目的；第二个部分指出道路交通事故纠纷司法实践中存在虚假证据的现象；第三个部分介绍死亡赔偿双重标准的法律渊源和理论渊源；第四个部分指出统一赔偿标准的必要性；第五个部分是统一赔偿标准的可行性思考,提出一些建议。
[Abstract]:There is a double standard of compensation for death in the system of compensation for personal injury in our country. In the interpretation of the media and the public, the theory of "the same life is not the same price" has been questioned, and the legal circles have not reached a consensus on the nature of the compensation for death. In recent years, with the development of economy and society, the process of urban-rural integration has been accelerated, and the realistic foundation of double compensation standard has been changed. In the increasingly socialized compensation system for road traffic accidents, double compensation standards have shown lag and brought some negative effects. With the deepening of the reform of the household registration system and the further narrowing of the differences between urban and rural areas, it is necessary to base on the characteristics of road traffic accidents, to learn from the experience of foreign countries and in our country's legislation, and to establish and improve the supporting mechanism. Gradually unify the urban and rural standards within a certain area. The structure of the article mainly consists of five parts, the first part is an introduction, summarizes the domestic and foreign scholars on the death compensation system research status, pointing out the purpose of this paper; The second part points out the phenomenon of false evidence in the judicial practice of road traffic accident dispute; the third part introduces the legal origin and theoretical origin of the double standard of death compensation; the fourth part points out the necessity of unifying the standard of compensation. The fifth part is the feasibility of unified compensation standards, and put forward some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：西南财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.14;D923
本文编号：2395179
[Abstract]:There is a double standard of compensation for death in the system of compensation for personal injury in our country. In the interpretation of the media and the public, the theory of "the same life is not the same price" has been questioned, and the legal circles have not reached a consensus on the nature of the compensation for death. In recent years, with the development of economy and society, the process of urban-rural integration has been accelerated, and the realistic foundation of double compensation standard has been changed. In the increasingly socialized compensation system for road traffic accidents, double compensation standards have shown lag and brought some negative effects. With the deepening of the reform of the household registration system and the further narrowing of the differences between urban and rural areas, it is necessary to base on the characteristics of road traffic accidents, to learn from the experience of foreign countries and in our country's legislation, and to establish and improve the supporting mechanism. Gradually unify the urban and rural standards within a certain area. The structure of the article mainly consists of five parts, the first part is an introduction, summarizes the domestic and foreign scholars on the death compensation system research status, pointing out the purpose of this paper; The second part points out the phenomenon of false evidence in the judicial practice of road traffic accident dispute; the third part introduces the legal origin and theoretical origin of the double standard of death compensation; the fourth part points out the necessity of unifying the standard of compensation. The fifth part is the feasibility of unified compensation standards, and put forward some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：西南财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.14;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 梁慧星;;中国侵权责任法解说[J];北方法学;2011年01期
2 王利明;;侵权责任法的中国特色[J];法学家;2010年02期
3 孙鹏;徐银波;;我国死亡损害赔偿的立论审思与制度完善[J];甘肃社会科学;2012年02期
4 杨立新;;侵权责任法立法最新讨论的50个问题[J];河北法学;2009年12期
5 麻昌华;宋敏;;论死亡赔偿的立法选择[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年02期
6 张潜伟;;生命的价值学说的价值与死亡赔偿——兼论精神损害赔偿的计算公式[J];河北法学;2013年03期
7 孙鹏;;“同命”真该“同价”?——对死亡损害赔偿的民法思考[J];法学论坛;2007年02期
8 卢志刚;章根明;;道路交通事故受害人社会化救济机制探讨[J];社会科学家;2012年02期
9 张新宝;;《侵权责任法》死亡赔偿制度解读[J];中国法学;2010年03期
10 孙鹏;胡建;;死亡损害赔偿额的算定——以法经济学的分析为视角[J];学术论坛;2012年11期
，本文编号：2395179
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2395179.html
