国际海上私人武装保安合同的效力
发布时间：2019-01-02 14:12
【摘要】：海盗行为威胁世界海运秩序和我国航运安全,各国在实践中发现借助军队护航有其局限性,因此很多航运主体更加青睐保安公司,实务中部分保安服务等级也升级至配备私人武装,但配备私人武装的合理性尚存质疑。我国政府不允许国内保安公司配备私人武装,很多航运主体转向雇佣配备私人武装的外国保安公司,并根据保安公司与客户之间的服务合同当中并无"配备武装"字样免责。考虑到默示接受行业习惯和限制适用意思自治原则两个问题,雇佣外国保安服务如果违反我国国内法的强制规定,我国航运主体同样应当承担相应法律责任。
[Abstract]:Piracy threatens the world shipping order and the safety of shipping in China. In practice, countries have found that the use of military escort has its limitations, so many shipping bodies prefer security companies. In practice, some security services are upgraded to private armed forces, but the reasonableness of equipping them remains questionable. Our government does not allow domestic security companies to be equipped with private arms, and many shipping bodies turn to foreign security companies equipped with private arms, and there is no exemption for "armed" under service contracts between security companies and customers. Considering the two problems of tacit acceptance of the trade custom and the principle of limiting the autonomy of application of the will, if the employment of foreign security services violates the compulsory provisions of our domestic law, the subject of shipping in our country should also bear the corresponding legal responsibility.
【作者单位】： 大连海事大学法学院;
【基金】：国家哲学社会科学基金一般项目“海上防空识别区理论与实践的法律研究”(14BFX128) 国家哲学社会科学基金项目“海洋行政体制改革的法律保障研究”(13BFX037)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.14
[Abstract]:Piracy threatens the world shipping order and the safety of shipping in China. In practice, countries have found that the use of military escort has its limitations, so many shipping bodies prefer security companies. In practice, some security services are upgraded to private armed forces, but the reasonableness of equipping them remains questionable. Our government does not allow domestic security companies to be equipped with private arms, and many shipping bodies turn to foreign security companies equipped with private arms, and there is no exemption for "armed" under service contracts between security companies and customers. Considering the two problems of tacit acceptance of the trade custom and the principle of limiting the autonomy of application of the will, if the employment of foreign security services violates the compulsory provisions of our domestic law, the subject of shipping in our country should also bear the corresponding legal responsibility.
【作者单位】： 大连海事大学法学院;
【基金】：国家哲学社会科学基金一般项目“海上防空识别区理论与实践的法律研究”(14BFX128) 国家哲学社会科学基金项目“海洋行政体制改革的法律保障研究”(13BFX037)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.14
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贺小勇;;上海自贸试验区法治深化亟需解决的法律问题[J];东方法学;2017年01期
2 刘笑晨;王淑敏;;全球治理视角下打击海上恐怖主义的法律机制问题初探[J];中国海商法研究;2016年04期
3 佟尧;王国华;;中国海事关系法律适用法完善之研究——《海商法》第十四章修改的必要性及具体建议[J];中国海商法研究;2016年04期
4 曾志平;;一种对军事法知识来源的追溯:论命令权[J];政法论丛;2016年04期
5 袁s，
本文编号：2398596
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2398596.html
