在警务执法中的民事自助行为研究
[Abstract]:The system of civil self-help behavior has important value for policing law enforcement. It can not only maintain social order and justice, but also help police personnel to judge the legality of the party's behavior when they exercise public power. Regarding the judgment of self-help behavior, we should insist on the five elements theory. Firstly, in order to protect his legitimate right of claim, the actor should emphasize the right of self-help "self", exclude the rights of others and public interests, and draw a clear line with self-defense and emergency and other self-defense acts. It emphasizes that the self-help should have the legal right of claim and the right of claim in private law. Second, the situation is urgent to implement self-help behavior. A decision on the urgency of a situation means that the victim has no time to request public assistance, or that, although he has requested public assistance, it has been refused or sustained by the other party without a reply. The necessity of self-help is reflected in the necessity of self-help if it is not carried out in such an emergency, Then the right of claim is very difficult to achieve or even impossible. Thirdly, self-help method is necessary to guarantee the realization of claim right. The behavior is directed against the debtor's property or person, such as seizing the debtor's property, damaging his property or restricting his personal freedom, and so on. The method and means should be necessary to protect the realization of the right of claim. Again, self-help behavior must not exceed the necessary limits. Self-help behavior judgment, for movable property in civil self-help behavior detention, damage, personal restraint, of course, should grasp the "minimum harm principle", that is, the main elements of self-help behavior can not be excessive, so according to the principle of minimum harm, Withholding one movable property can preserve one's own creditor's rights, and the second movable property may not be seized again; If the withholding can solve the problem, the body of the debtor can no longer be detained; moreover, if the withholding can achieve the preservation of the creditor's rights, it can no longer be damaged. Self-help behavior shall not violate the law and morality. Finally, after the self-help behavior requests the public power intervention and the disposition in time. For the destruction of things, self-help persons need not apply for the intervention or disposal of public power organs, but according to the detention of persons or the seizure of property, they should apply to the public power for assistance in time, and the judgment of public power should be brought into the track of public relief. The application of self-help behavior should pay attention to the limits of the crime of violating public security management and illegally restricting personal freedom, of illegal detention, of kidnapping, of snatching, of robbing, of trespassing on houses, and of intentionally destroying public and private property. In police law enforcement, we should make full use of the theory of self-help behavior, not only to clarify the physical composition of self-help behavior, but also to draw a clear line with similar illegal and criminal acts, and to further improve the law enforcement procedures. Bring self-help behavior and peace into the public relief track.
【学位授予单位】:天津师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923;D922.14
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曹军梅;设立自助行为制度的必要性及其构成要件[J];辽阳石油化工高等专科学校学报;2000年04期
2 徐建伟;论自助行为[J];理论观察;2001年01期
3 李蕊,张英秋;论权利保护上的自助行为[J];山东社会科学;2001年06期
4 贺光辉;民事自助行为研究[J];湖北社会科学;2002年11期
5 徐睿;试论规范自助行为的必要性[J];常州工学院学报;2003年03期
6 周力娜;自助行为的刑事正当化[J];四川警官高等专科学校学报;2005年01期
7 丁然;;我国民法中自助行为构建之价值分析——兼评我国“梁稿”草案中自助行为的规定[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2008年12期
8 苏贺新;;论民法上的自助行为[J];黑河学刊;2008年03期
9 成天柱;;民法上的自助行为[J];湘潮(下半月);2010年09期
10 李莹;;私力救济之民事自助行为[J];大庆师范学院学报;2011年04期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 马征;李志勋;;民事自助行为制度的探讨——失主承担小偷被撞责任分析[A];当代法学论坛(2008年第3辑)[C];2008年
2 谷升;;浅析民事执行程序中的自助行为[A];全国法院系统第二十二届学术讨论会论文集[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 陈克军 王小初;解析自助行为[N];人民法院报;2004年
2 郑鹏举 杨迎辉;自助行为不得滥用[N];秦皇岛日报;2006年
3 陈健;民事自助行为的适用应有“度”[N];江苏经济报;2010年
4 天津商业大学法学院 沃耘;我国未来《民法典》民事自助行为的制度化[N];光明日报;2012年
5 记者 郑金雄 通讯员 魏炜;“自助行为”不是“胁迫”[N];人民法院报;2006年
6 蒋庆生;自助行为不构成侵权[N];中国民族报;2003年
7 齐海生;被劫司机驾车撞劫匪致伤该行为应如何定性[N];人民法院报;2004年
8 朱晓敏(苏·通州市);谈自助制度的建立[N];人民代表报;2002年
9 深圳特区报记者 吴涛 通讯员 谭晓鹏 二级法官,现任深圳市中级法院民事审判第一庭审判员 黄国辉;两颗糖忘付款老太遭盘问晕倒[N];深圳特区报;2010年
10 梁是中 ;滞留行为距“非法拘禁罪”有多远[N];人民公安报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 沃耘;民事自助行为研究[D];黑龙江大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 蔡振秀;自助行为制度之探讨[D];重庆大学;2009年
2 白鹭;论自助行为[D];大连海事大学;2010年
3 李琼;侵权法中自助行为制度研究[D];湖南师范大学;2010年
4 范晶晶;侵权法中的自助行为研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年
5 苏贺新;论民法上的自助行为[D];吉林大学;2007年
6 冯志刚;民法上之自助行为研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年
7 王玲;民法上的自助行为制度研究[D];沈阳工业大学;2012年
8 徐战辉;论民事自助行为[D];河南大学;2012年
9 梁京红;论自助行为的立法完善[D];甘肃政法学院;2012年
10 刘睿;论自助行为[D];黑龙江大学;2013年
,本文编号:2415146
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2415146.html