行政决策中公众参与的法律问题研究

发布时间：2019-01-26 12:20

【摘要】：随着我国行政民主化的快速提升，公众参与成为衡量行政决策科学性的一个重要指标。本文从公众参与、行政决策的概念着手，通过对比大陆法系与英美法系行政法学不同来介绍美国、英国、德国的公众参与行政决策的发展概况，，在一定程度上对西方国家的公众参与理论加以了解。随后开始从政策、法律、实践层面概括出我国行政决策中公众参与发展现状并介绍现行法律中公众参与行政决策的三种常见形式，以及从流程的角度上分析各各程序阶段的公众参与。分析其存在的合法性与正当性，从根本上为我国行政决策中的公众参与制度提供支持。虽然我国一直在进行公众参与行政决策相关的实践探索，并取得巨大进步，但是，当前我国公众参行政决策仍然存在着政治参与意识淡薄、参与主体不明确、参与度不高、参与信息缺乏、以及参与意见得不到反馈等五个方面问题。针对上述情况，本文从系统的角度，提出以下可行性措施进行完善：树立行政决策的民主化、科学化的理念、加强公众参与行政决策的载体建设以及建立与完善公众参与行政决策的相关制度。
[Abstract]:With the rapid promotion of administrative democratization in China, public participation has become an important indicator to measure the scientific nature of administrative decision-making. From the concept of public participation and administrative decision-making, this paper introduces the development of public participation in administrative decision-making in the United States, Britain and Germany by comparing the differences between the civil law system and the common law system. To some extent, to understand the theory of public participation in western countries. Then, from the aspects of policy, law and practice, it generalizes the current situation of public participation in administrative decision-making and introduces three common forms of public participation in administrative decision-making. And from the point of view of the process of analysis of the various stages of the process of public participation. This paper analyzes the legitimacy and legitimacy of its existence and provides support for the system of public participation in administrative decision making in our country. Although our country has been carrying on the practice exploration related to the public participation in administrative decision-making, and has made great progress, but at present, there is still a weak sense of political participation, the participation of the main body is not clear, the degree of participation is not high. There are five problems, such as the lack of information and the lack of feedback. In view of the above situation, this paper puts forward the following feasible measures from a systematic point of view: to establish the idea of democratization and scientization of administrative decision making, Strengthen the carrier construction of public participation in administrative decision-making and establish and perfect the relevant system of public participation in administrative decision-making.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】