我国质询权法律规范的问题分析及完善建议

发布时间：2019-05-13 07:59

【摘要】：人大监督权的实现对于国家权力的有效运转,人民权利的保障有着重要作用,而质询权作为监督权的一种重要形式,无论是理论上还是实践中,都没有得到足够的重视,从而也影响了质询权的实效发挥,不利于监督权的实现。作为质询权实施最根本的依凭,质询权法律规范的完善与否对质询权运行有着至关重要的作用,本文以我国质询权法律规范为中心,首先就质询权的概念、性质、特点、功能、渊源和发展等作必要概述；其次是介绍了我国既有的质询权法律规范内容,并从质询权实体规范层面存在的质询权需人大代表集体行使、质询案提起人数划分不当、质询权的内容尚无规范、司法机关是否为质询对象、个人应否作为质询对象五个方面来分析其问题,而程序规范层面则就提起质询案的时间限制、提起质询案的形式限制、质询答复程序规定过于笼统、质询缺乏结果程序这四个方面来分析其存在的问题；最后结合西方议会制国家的相关规定,针对上述问题建议分别从放宽提起质询的人数要求、增加质询权内容的法律规范、明确司法机关和机关负责人作为质询权对象三方面来完善我国质询权的实体法律规范,而程序规范方面就启动程序、答复程序、结果程序三方面来提出完善建议。
[Abstract]:The realization of the supervision power of the National people's Congress plays an important role in the effective operation of state power and the protection of the rights of the people, and the right of inquiry, as an important form of supervision power, has not been paid enough attention either in theory or in practice. Thus, it also affects the actual effect of the right of inquiry, which is not conducive to the realization of the power of supervision. As the most fundamental basis for the implementation of the right of inquiry, the perfection of the legal norms of the right of inquiry plays a vital role in the operation of the right of inquiry. This paper focuses on the legal norms of the right of inquiry in our country, first of all, on the concept, nature, characteristics and functions of the right of inquiry. Make a necessary summary of the origin and development; Secondly, it introduces the existing legal norms of the right of inquiry in our country, and from the level of the norms of the entity of the right of inquiry, the right of inquiry needs to be exercised collectively by the deputies to the National people's Congress, the number of cases raised is improperly divided, and the content of the right of inquiry is not yet standardized. Whether the judiciary is the object of questioning or not, whether individuals should analyze their problems as the object of inquiry, while at the level of procedural norms, the time limit for filing questions, the formal restrictions on filing questions, and the procedures for answering questions are too general. The lack of outcome procedure is used to analyze the existing problems. Finally, combined with the relevant provisions of the western parliamentary countries, in view of the above problems, it is suggested that the legal norms of the content of the right of inquiry should be increased by relaxing the requirements for the number of people asking questions. Make clear that the judicial organ and the person in charge of the organ as the object of inquiry right to improve the substantive legal norms of the right of inquiry in our country, and the procedural norms on the initiation of procedures, response procedures, results procedures to improve the three aspects of suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：福建师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】