中国知识产权审判技术调查官制度研究

发布时间：2018-01-18 07:16

本文关键词：中国知识产权审判技术调查官制度研究　出处：《广东外语外贸大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：知识产权案件具有较强的专业性,往往是技术问题与法律问题交织在一起,而技术事实之审查是正确适用法律的前提,但是我国法官中的大多数不具有相关的学科背景。目前,我国技术事实查明的途径主要有司法鉴定、专家辅助人、专家咨询、专家陪审员。最高人民法院颁布《最高人民法院关于知识产权法院技术调查官参与诉讼活动若干问题的暂行规定》,知识产权审判技术调查官制度建立起来。我国的知识产权技术调查官制度主要借鉴日本技术调查官、德国技术法官和台湾技术审查官。由于我国是初次建立此制度,还有很多不完善之处,日本、德国、台湾规定已相对成熟,研究他们的制度规定,有利于我国制度的完善。技术调查官制度与其他几种技术事实查明制度都是帮助法官查明技术事实,但是几种制度有着许多不同之处,他们之间的关系该何去何从值得研究。发现我国技术调查官制度的不足之处,结合域外做法和三地知识产权法院的司法实践,提出切实可行并符合我国国情的技术调查官制度是本论文的研究重点。
[Abstract]:Intellectual property cases have a strong professional, often technical issues and legal issues intertwined, and the examination of technical facts is the premise of the correct application of the law. However, most of the judges in our country do not have the relevant subject background. At present, the main ways to find out the technical facts in our country are judicial identification, expert assistant, expert consultation. Expert jurors. The Supreme people's Court promulgated the interim provisions of the Supreme people's Court on certain issues concerning the participation of Technical Investigative officers in intellectual property Courts in Litigation activities. The system of intellectual property judicial technology investigator has been established. The intellectual property technology investigation officer system of our country mainly draws lessons from Japanese technology investigator. Technical judges in Germany and technical examiners in Taiwan. As China is the first time to establish this system, there are still many imperfections, Japan, Germany, Taiwan regulations have been relatively mature, study their system provisions. It is beneficial to the perfection of the system of our country. The system of technical investigation officer and several other systems of technical facts are all to help the judge to find out the technical facts, but there are many differences between the several systems. The relationship between them is worthy of study. Find out the shortcomings of the system of technical investigators in China, combining the extraterritorial approach and the judicial practice of the three intellectual property courts. It is the focus of this paper to put forward a feasible and suitable system of technical surveyors in our country.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.4

【相似文献】