实用艺术作品的知识产权保护问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-27 03:20

本文关键词： 实用艺术作品知识产权法实用性艺术性解构　出处：《复旦大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 实用艺术作品兼具艺术性和实用性两重特性,处在知识产权各部门法保护领域重叠交融的部分,因此其保护成为知识产权领域的一大难题。如何解决这一难题是本文的中心内容,实用艺术作品的内容庞杂、外延宽泛,既不能将其归入某个传统的保护主题之下(如美术作品),也不能独立自成一个主题来保护。笔者认为妥善的做法是先通过解构分析将所有被称为“实用艺术作品”的智力成果分解开来,再根据其各部分特征进行契合归入,恰当地置于知识产权各部门法的保护领域中进行保护。本文第一章介绍实用艺术作品的概念并对其进行解构,解构出其实用性、艺术性及独创性三大特征并在此基础上做分类,为分部分认定其法律性质做准备。第二章是实用艺术作品保护的国际法规定和西方一些国家的立法概览,并以美国为典型,围绕保护模式和法律定性两个问题对其相关立法与司法实践做详细介绍,同时指出其不足,为我国制度完善提供借鉴参考。第三章介绍我国实用艺术作品保护的立法和司法实践,并指出目前做法的弊端所在,为我国实用艺术作品知识产权保护制度的完善指出方向和目标。与美国相对应,本章论述同样围绕上述两个问题进行。第四章在前述三章的基础上对我国的实用艺术作品知识产权保护制度提出笔者自己的设计和完善意见。本文还有一条“暗线”伏于其中,第一章解构出实用艺术作品的三大特征,阐述了解构实用艺术作品的依据(即自身特征)；第二章的美国微观论述了分离原则,它和在它基础上发展而来的“定量分离”法一同阐述了解构实用艺术作品的方法(即如何解构的问题)；解构之后,在化整为零的基础上进行契合归入,完成我国实用艺术作品保护制度的设计。
[Abstract]:Practical works of art have the characteristics of both artistry and practicability, and they are in the overlapping and blending part of various branches of intellectual property protection, so their protection has become a major problem in the field of intellectual property. How to solve this problem is the central content of this paper, the content of practical works of art is complex and extensive, which can not be classified under a traditional protection theme (such as art works). The author thinks that it is good to decompose all the intellectual achievements which are called "practical works of art" through deconstruction analysis. According to the characteristics of each part of it, it is properly placed in the field of protection of intellectual property law. The first chapter introduces the concept of practical works of art and deconstructs them, and deconstructs its practical, artistic and original features and classifies them on this basis, in order to make preparations for determining the legal nature of the works in different parts. The second chapter is an overview of the protection of practical works of art in international law and some western countries, and the United States as a model. This paper introduces the relevant legislation and judicial practice around the protection mode and the legal characterization, and points out its shortcomings, which provides a reference for the perfection of our country's system. The third chapter introduces the legislative and judicial practice of the protection of practical works of art in China, and points out the drawbacks of the present practice. This chapter points out the direction and goal for the improvement of intellectual property protection system of practical works of art in China. On the basis of the above three chapters, Chapter 4th puts forward the author's own design and perfection suggestions on the intellectual property protection system of practical works of art in China. This article also has a "dark line" in which, the first chapter deconstructs the three characteristics of practical works of art, elaborated the basis of deconstruction of practical works of art (that is, their own characteristics); The second chapter discusses the principle of separation from the micro point of the United States, which, together with the "quantitative separation" method developed on the basis of it, expounds the method of deconstructing practical works of art (that is, the problem of how to deconstruct it). After deconstruction, on the basis of integration, complete the design of protection system of practical works of art in China.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D923.41

【引证文献】