域名与商标权利冲突的问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-28 22:07

本文关键词： 域名商标权利冲突　出处：《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：网络经济时代的到来，使得电子商务的地位在市场经济中得到了极大的提升。在这一过程里，商户在互联网世界的里的标志——域名，以其特有的地位，越发显示出其价值。但新兴事物的发展必将不断对传统权利发起冲击，必然致其与传统权利产生纠纷，从而挑战法律的与时俱进。这一问题，显然也存在与当前我国的法律实践之中。当前，域名与商标权利的冲突不断加大，使其成为理论界以及实务界迫于解决的问题。笔者以基础理论的方式对这一问题展开研究与探讨，试图在结合学术界的部分观点上，提出一些可行的解决方案，以期在实践之中得以应用。除去引言与结语部分，本文正文分为四个部分：第一部分，主要针对域名的一般法律属性进行讨论，主要分为其定义、特征、法律地位等。笔者从域名的定义以及其基本特征入手，，在讨论域名基本特征的前提下，对域名和商标权利进行了对比。同时，笔者分析了学术界对于域名法律地位的认定，在此基础上，认为域名具有与知识产权相识的特征而应当将其作为一种独立的知识产权进行认定。第二部分，主要针对当前实务中域名与商标权利的冲突原因与其常见类型进行分析。笔者从内部和外部原因对二者的冲突进行分析，内部原因即为域名与商标二者之间存在的固有区别而导致的原因。外部原因即为当前国际以及国内通行的注册体质所存在的问题。同时，笔者分析了目前实务中所存在的几种常见的冲突类型。第三部分，主要是对国内外针对域名与商标权利冲突的立法进行分析。主要是针对当前互联网络发达的美国、日本以及德国进行分析，同时对其中有利的部分进行借鉴。进而分析我国国内目前主要用以调整该冲突的立法，与上述的国家进行一定的对比。第四部分，分析我国目前域名与商标权利冲突中存在的问题并提出完善建议。笔者认为，当前我国存在的问题主要有，域名与商标权利发生冲突时，其法律性质无法确定，同时我国对于恶意的认定之规定较为笼统。笔者对这些问题进行分析，同时结合上述国外的立法，提出了部分合理的完善建议。
[Abstract]:With the advent of network economy, the status of electronic commerce has been greatly improved in the market economy. In this process, the domain name, the symbol of business in the Internet world, has its unique status. More and more show its value. But the development of new things will continue to impact on the traditional rights, it will inevitably lead to disputes with the traditional rights, thus challenging the law with the times. Obviously, there is also a conflict between domain name and trademark rights in the current legal practice of our country. The author studies and discusses this problem in the way of basic theory, and tries to put forward some feasible solutions in combination with some viewpoints of academic circles. In order to be applied in practice. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into four parts: The first part mainly discusses the general legal attributes of domain name, mainly divided into its definition, characteristics, legal status, etc. The author starts with the definition of domain name and its basic characteristics. On the premise of discussing the basic characteristics of domain name, the author compares the domain name and trademark rights. At the same time, the author analyzes the legal status of the domain name in academia, on this basis. Domain name should be recognized as an independent intellectual property because it has the characteristics of acquaintance with intellectual property. The second part mainly analyzes the conflict causes and common types of domain name and trademark rights in current practice. The author analyzes the conflict between the two from the internal and external reasons. The internal reason is the inherent difference between the domain name and the trademark. The external reason is the existing problem of the current international and domestic registration constitution. At the same time. The author analyzes several common conflict types in practice. The third part is mainly to analyze the domestic and foreign legislation on the conflict between domain name and trademark rights, mainly for the United States, Japan and Germany, where the Internet is developed. At the same time, the author draws lessons from the beneficial part, and then analyzes the domestic legislation which is mainly used to adjust the conflict, and compares it with the above countries to a certain extent. Part 4th analyzes the problems existing in the conflict between domain name and trademark rights in China and puts forward some suggestions. The author believes that the main problems in China are when the domain name and trademark rights conflict. The nature of the law can not be determined, at the same time, the provisions of malicious identification in our country are relatively general. The author analyzes these problems, and at the same time, combined with the foreign legislation, puts forward some reasonable suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.43

【参考文献】