专利侵权纠纷行政裁决的程序协调及相关问题之解构——以苹果公司诉北京市知识产权局及其关联案件为例

发布时间：2018-02-20 14:45

本文关键词： 专利侵权纠纷行政处理行政裁决专利侵权诉讼司法审查确认不侵权行政诉讼　出处：《知识产权》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：苹果公司诉北京市知识产权局及其关联案件涉及到专利侵权纠纷行政裁决及其司法审查、确认不侵权诉讼三种程序之间的衔接和协调,具有梳理程序设计内在机理的重要案例价值。专利侵权纠纷行政裁决与侵权诉讼程序的协调应遵循诉讼优先、先立则斥原则。行政裁决应对侵权诉讼程序保持充分的谦抑性,体现诉讼优先原则;而行政裁决的司法审查应充分关注其相对简易性和快捷性,在监督其合法性同时保持充分的谦抑性;构建两者之间途径相异而心定归一的和谐关系。针对同一的专利侵权争议,侵权救济程序与确认不侵权诉讼之间应以一事不再理为原则,以两者的合并审理为例外。
[Abstract]:Apple Inc. v. Beijing intellectual property Office and its related cases involve administrative adjudication of patent infringement disputes and their judicial review, confirming the convergence and coordination of the three procedures for non-infringement litigation. The coordination between the administrative adjudication of patent infringement dispute and the tort procedure should follow the principle of litigation first, and the principle that the administrative ruling should maintain sufficient modesty. The judicial review of administrative decision should pay full attention to its relative simplicity and quickness, and maintain its full modesty while supervising its legality. In view of the same patent infringement dispute, the principle of non bis in idem should be taken as the principle between the tort relief procedure and the confirmation of non-infringement action, with the exception of the combination of the two.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学;国家知识产权局保护协调司;
【分类号】：D920.5;D923.42

【相似文献】