专利产品平行进口的法律问题研究
发布时间:2018-03-05 08:45
本文选题:专利产品平行进口 切入点:权利穷竭原则 出处:《兰州大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:人类的一切活动都是围绕经济为基础的,人类的活动基本上都是为了获得经济利益,由于不同的地方有不同的经济发展水平和购买力,不同国家、不同地区的劳动力、原材料价格有所不同,而专利权人往往会把这些费用转嫁于消费者,从而导致同一产品不同地区的价格差,正是这价格差促使专利产品平行进口的产生。由于灰色交易商的成本费用较低和全球自由贸易自由化的加剧,使专利产品平行进口越发普遍。 随着经济发展世界一体化进程的加速,产品平行进口中越来越多地涉及到知识产权的保护问题,专利权的基本属性与国际贸易的目的却相互冲突,所以关于专利产品的平行进口是否合法引起了很大争议。有关专利权的权利穷竭问题,世界各国的立法和司法实践差异很大,理论界也就此争议多年。而TRIPS协议第6条将专利权的权利穷竭问题交由各国根据各自国内法处理,使得各国在关于平行进口的司法实践各有特点,无法统一。 我国新专利法允许专利产品的平行进口后,利弊并存,我们应分析其利弊并在参考国外先进立法的基础上对各方利益的保护与调和提出可操作性建议来扬长避短。本文分为四个部分: 首先,介绍专利产品平行进口的概念,特征,以及表现形式,产生原因; 其次,提出专利平行进口的依据及其冲突; 再次,对国外发达国家对专利产品平行进口的规定与司法实践进行考察; 最后对我国专利产品平行进口的现状进行阐释并针对多方利益的保护提出相应对策。通篇采用规范分析法,比较分析法,案例分析法等研究方法对专利产品平行进口的法律问题进行研究,从多方面综合考虑提出相应的应对措施,从而使社会各方利益达到调和。
[Abstract]:All human activities are based on the economy. Human activities are basically for the benefit of the economy, because different places have different levels of economic development and purchasing power, different countries and different regions of the labor force, Raw material prices vary, and patentees tend to pass on these costs to consumers, leading to poor prices in different regions of the same product. Because of the low cost of grey dealers and the increase of free trade liberalization, parallel import of patent products becomes more and more common. With the acceleration of the world integration process of economic development, the protection of intellectual property rights is more and more involved in the parallel import of products, but the basic attributes of patent right and the purpose of international trade conflict with each other. Therefore, whether the parallel import of patented products is legal has aroused great controversy. With regard to the exhaustion of patent rights, the legislation and judicial practice of countries in the world vary greatly. Article 6 of the TRIPS Agreement refers the exhaustion of patent rights to each country according to their respective domestic laws, which makes each country have its own characteristics in the judicial practice of parallel import, which can not be unified. After China's new patent law allows parallel imports of patented products, there are both advantages and disadvantages. We should analyze its advantages and disadvantages and put forward operational suggestions on the protection and reconciliation of the interests of all parties on the basis of reference to foreign advanced legislation. This paper is divided into four parts:. First of all, it introduces the concept, characteristics, forms and causes of parallel import of patent products. Secondly, it puts forward the basis and conflict of patent parallel import. Thirdly, the regulation and judicial practice of parallel import of patent products in developed countries are investigated. Finally, it explains the current situation of parallel import of patent products in China and puts forward corresponding countermeasures for the protection of various interests. Case analysis and other research methods study the legal problems of parallel import of patent products and put forward corresponding countermeasures from various aspects so as to reconcile the interests of all parties in the society.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 梁银湘;王伍萍;韩洁波;;金融危机背景下的知识产权平行进口探析[J];创新;2010年03期
2 张悦;;论专利权穷竭原则[J];东华大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
3 栾春娟;王贺国;;论专利权穷竭[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
4 尹锋林;;美国专利产品平行进口规则及对我国的借鉴意义[J];法学杂志;2011年03期
5 刘文静;;论专利实施许可中的风险控制[J];法制与社会;2011年02期
6 闫可荣;;关于技术引进企业知识产权权属风险的几点思考[J];法制与社会;2012年26期
7 范丽娜;唐宝丽;;国际贸易中的平行进口与知识产权保护[J];河北青年管理干部学院学报;2006年03期
8 贾翔宇;;论专利产品的平行进口[J];商场现代化;2012年23期
9 刘亚军;马乐;;我国专利产品平行进口制度新发展之理论探究——以《专利法》的修改为考察对象[J];社会科学战线;2012年08期
,本文编号:1569536
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1569536.html