药品专利侵权判定中等同原则的应用

发布时间：2018-03-09 08:05

本文选题：专利侵权　切入点：等同原则　出处：《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：当今社会，知识产权越来越被人们重视，知识产权战略正日益成为衡量一个国家综合竞争力的重要因素。专利权作为知识产权的重要组成部分，也是国家知识产权战略的重要一环。随着我国专利技术的飞速发展，大量的专利技术在给专利权人带来经济效益的同时，也为社会公众提供了高端的科学技术，极大地促进了社会的发展。然而，另一方面，专利技术所产生的巨大经济利益使很多非专利权人冒着违反法律的风险作出了侵权行为。目前，专利侵权已成为知识产权诉讼中的一大问题，而专利侵权判定则是专利诉讼中各方当事人都十分重视的问题之一。等同原则是专利侵权判定的一项重要原则。科技的飞速发展使得侵权人在侵权的策略上作出了重大改变，即由原来简单的相同侵权转变为目前最常见的等同侵权，而等同原则就是判定一个行为是否构成对专利的等同侵权的最重要原则之一。药品领域的专利侵权是专利界尤其复杂却又十分重要的一部分，，药品是关系人类身体健康与生命安全的产品，因此对药品专利侵权的判定进行探索与研究是对专利权的重视，也是对生命的敬重。由于药品自身的复杂性，对药品专利的侵权也相对较难判定。本文选取澳诺（中国）制药与湖北午时药业公司的专利侵权一案为例，共分为五部分，讨论了等同原则在药品专利侵权判定中的应用这一话题。第一部分介绍了本文所讨论案例的基本情况，包括案情简介、审判结果和争议焦点。第二部分介绍了等同原则在专利侵权判定中适用时要用到的基础理论。本部分分为两小部分，包括权利要求书中的权利要求解释和权利要求解释与专利侵权判定的关系。前者除了介绍权利要求解释的基本含义之外，还讨论了组合物权利要求中的封闭式权利要求与开放式权利要求。第三部分是等同原则的应用和等同技术特征的判定。本部分总结了等同原则的基本理论，并从两个方面主要讨论了等同技术特征的判定规则。判定等同技术特征要遵循两个规则，即“全部技术特征”规则和“手段-功能-效果”三段式规则。在“全部技术特征”规则部分，通过引用美国适用这个规则的发展历程及适用方式，探讨了我国专利界应用该规则判定等同技术特征方面的问题。第四部分在第三部分的基础上，探讨了药品专利领域在判定等同技术特征时应该注意的特殊问题。结合本文引用案例，主要从组合物复方制剂的角度讨论了药品组分的比对、药品组分用量的比对以及其他因素对判定等同技术特征的影响。其他因素部分主要从药物制剂形态对判定等同技术特征的影响展开。第五部分从侧面介绍了等同原则的应用，即禁止反悔原则对等同原则的限制。主要从三个方面讨论：何种修改、陈述会导致适用禁止反悔原则的适用，适用禁止反悔原则对等同原则的适用产生何种影响，以及禁止反悔原则在我国的适用方式。
[Abstract]:In today's society, more and more people pay attention to intellectual property rights, intellectual property strategy is becoming an important factor to measure the competitiveness of a country's patent right. As an important part of intellectual property, but also the national intellectual property strategy an important part. With the rapid development of China's patent technology, a large number of patents in the patent right bring economic benefits to the people at the same time, also provides the high science and technology to the public, has greatly promoted the development of the society. However, on the other hand, the huge economic interests of patent technology produces so many non patent risk in violation of the law made the infringement. At present, the patent infringement has become a big problem in intellectual property litigation, and patent infringement is one of the parties in patent litigation parties attach great importance to the problem. The doctrine of equivalents is a patent infringement An important principle. The rapid development of science and technology makes the infringer infringement strategy has made major changes, the same change from the original simple tort is the most common equivalent infringement, while the same principle is to determine whether an act constitutes patent as the most important one of the principles of tort. In the field of drug patent infringement of patent circles in particular part of a complex but very important, drugs are the relationship between human health and life safety of the product, so the exploration and research of the patent right attention to determine the drug patent infringement, but also the respect for life. Because of the complexity of the drug itself, the pharmaceutical patent infringement is relatively difficult to determine.
This paper selects Aonuo Pharmaceutical (China) and Hubei Wushi pharmaceuticals patent infringement case as an example, is divided into five parts, discusses the application of topic equivalent principle in drug patent infringement.
The first part introduces the basic situation of the case discussed in this article, including the brief introduction, the result of the trial and the focus of the dispute.
The second part introduces the basic theory of equivalent principle in patent infringement should be applied when used. This part is divided into two parts, including the claims of the claims in the relationship between the interpretation and interpretation of claims and patent infringement. In addition to the basic meaning of the former claim interpretation, closed claim composition in the claims and opening claim was also discussed.
The third part is to determine the application and the equivalent principle of equal technical features. This part summarizes the basic theory of equivalent principle, and from two aspects mainly discussed the decision rules of equal technical features. Technical characteristics of equivalents should follow two rules, namely "all elements rule" and the "means function effect" the three section type rules. In "all technical features" part of the rules, by referencing the development process of the United States is the rule and mode of application, discusses our country patent community application of the rule to determine the technical characteristics of equivalent problems.
In the fourth part, on the basis of the third part, discusses the special problems should be paid attention to pharmaceutical patent field equal technical features in the determination. This article combines the case, mainly from the composition of compound preparation were discussed on the drug composition, ratio of drug components dosage and other factors to determine the effect of equal technical features. Some factors mainly focuses on the effects of drug preparation form for technical feature of equivalents.
The fifth part introduces the application of the principle from the side, namely the principle of estoppel to limit the doctrine of equivalent. Mainly from three aspects to discuss: what changes, statements will lead to apply the principle of estoppel, estoppel principles apply impact on the application of the doctrine of equivalents, and the principle of Estoppel in application in China.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】