开放平台个人数据的商业化利用与私法保护
发布时间:2018-03-10 16:23
本文选题:开放平台 切入点:个人数据 出处:《北京邮电大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:开放平台凭借其出色的资源整合优势已成为互联网企业争相采用的商业模式,因其能增强互联网企业的创新性,释放平台创造力,扶植以开放应用小软件为生的中小企业,故其也必然成为互联网产业的发展趋势。然而,由于这一商业模式涉及主体多样,运作流程复杂,配套法律制度不成熟不齐备,且国内至今并未出台系统的个人数据相关的法律法规,使得互联网企业在经营其开放平台的过程中存在诸多隐忧及法律风险。 本文认为个人数据是指以任何形式存在的可以直接或间接识别出自然人身份的一个或多个信息的组合。其分为与人格利益相关的个人数据和与人格利益无关的个人数据。其中,个人数据所含有的商业价值具有稀缺性、有用性和可控制性,可以作为财产权的客体。因而,个人数据商业化利用具有合理性和必要性。 而当前并未出台有关个人信息保护的系统性法律,法学理论又固守隐私权保护理论,导致个人数据商业化利用在理论上缺乏正当性与合理性。针对此种情况,首先应该转变传统法学中个人数据人格权说的观念,明确个人数据分为与人格利益有关的个人数据和与人格利益无关的个人数据,并承认个人数据具有独立的商业价值。对于目前正在制定中的《民法典》总则及各编中进行相应的调整:在人格权编中,仅将与人格利益有关的个人数据纳入其中进行保护。而将与人格利益无关的个人数据的商业价值纳入到财产编进行保护。财产权一编中,除债权外的广义物权法中可区分为传统的物权法和信息财产法。信息财产法保护的客体即是个人数据的财产价值,故而又可分为具有独创性的信息财产权----即知识产权和非独创性的信息财产权。其中,在物权法一章中,应承认信息存储空间的独立法律地位。侵权法一编中,应贯穿个人数据商业价值财产性这一观念。确立个人数据商业价值以及信息存储空间可作为侵权法保护的利益之一。并对人格利益与财产利益予以平等保护。在个人数据的专门立法中应确立个人数据保护的基本原则。此外,由于互联网发展的迅速性与立法滞后性之间的矛盾,应充分重视互联网行业自律在规制个人数据的商业利用与保护中的作用。在开放平台的具体商业实践中,应加强行业自律组织的作用,统一平台的隐私政策,规范《用户软件许可使用协议》与《开放平台者协议》,按照《合同法》基本原理和个人数据利用的基本原则作出相应调整。
[Abstract]:Open platform, with its outstanding resource integration advantage, has become a competitive business model for Internet companies, because it can enhance the innovation of Internet enterprises, release platform creativity, and foster small and medium-sized enterprises that live on open application of small software. Therefore, it will inevitably become the trend of the development of the Internet industry. However, due to the diversity of the main body involved in this business model, the operation process is complex, and the supporting legal system is not mature and complete. And there is no systematic personal data related laws and regulations in China, which makes Internet enterprises have many hidden worries and legal risks in the process of operating their open platform. In this paper, personal data is defined as a combination of one or more information that can directly or indirectly identify the identity of a natural person in any form. It is divided into personal data related to personal interests and independent of personality interests. Personal data. Of which, The commercial value contained in personal data is rare, useful and controllable, and can be regarded as the object of property right. Therefore, the commercial use of personal data is reasonable and necessary. However, there is no systematic law on the protection of personal information at present, and the legal theory adheres to the theory of privacy protection, which leads to the lack of legitimacy and rationality of the commercial use of personal data in theory. First of all, we should change the concept of personal data personality right in traditional jurisprudence, and make it clear that personal data can be divided into personal data related to personality interests and personal data independent of personality interests. And recognizing the independent commercial value of personal data. The general provisions of the Civil Code, which are currently under development, and the respective sections are adjusted accordingly: in the personal Rights Code, Only personal data related to personal interests are protected... and the commercial value of personal data not related to personal interests is included in the property series for protection... property rights, In addition to creditor's rights, the generalized property law can be divided into traditional property law and information property law. The object protected by information property law is the property value of personal data. Therefore, it can be divided into original information property rights, that is, intellectual property rights and non-original information property rights, in which, in the chapter of property law, the independent legal status of information storage space should be recognized. The commercial value of personal data and the property property should be permeated. The commercial value of personal data and the storage space of information can be regarded as one of the interests protected by tort law, and the interests of personality and property should be protected equally. The basic principles of personal data protection should be established in specific legislation on personal data... in addition, Due to the contradiction between the rapid development of the Internet and the lag in legislation, we should pay full attention to the role of self-discipline in regulating the commercial use and protection of personal data. It is necessary to strengthen the role of industry self-discipline organizations, unify the privacy policy of the platform, standardize the user Software license Agreement and the Open platform Agreement, and make corresponding adjustments in accordance with the basic principles of contract Law and the basic principles of personal data utilization.
【学位授予单位】:北京邮电大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 齐爱民;;信息社会中个人信息的滥用与人格权侵害[J];重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
2 张甜甜;;档案开放利用中个人信息保护之管见[J];档案管理;2007年03期
3 马琳;宋俊德;宋美娜;;开放平台:运营模式与技术架构研究综述[J];电信科学;2012年06期
4 张钦坤;;云计算、开放平台与服务商版权责任[J];电子知识产权;2012年12期
5 张金城;廖永威;;香港个人资料隐私保护之经验——兼论我国个人资料保护法之制定[J];河北法学;2008年11期
6 汤擎;试论个人数据与相关的法律关系[J];华东政法学院学报;2000年05期
7 谭晨辉;刘青炎;;OpenAPI出现、起源与现状[J];程序员;2008年07期
8 宋誉;;基于腾讯开放平台的第三方应用研究[J];科技创业月刊;2012年05期
9 詹新惠;;开放平台的喜与忧[J];青年记者;2011年04期
10 刘德良;;确认个人信息的财产属性 抑制垃圾信息泛滥[J];世界电信;2010年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 向欣;网络中个人数据隐私权的民法保护[D];西南财经大学;2005年
2 郑素梅;论我国个人信息的法律保护[D];暨南大学;2006年
3 苏长江;个人信息商业化利用的民法保护[D];内蒙古大学;2009年
,本文编号:1594125
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1594125.html